Evapotranspiration of typical agroecosystems in the North China Plain based on single crop coefficient method
-
摘要: 作物系数法可以简单、准确地反映作物不同生育期内实际蒸散量变化规律及特点, 但针对华北平原地区不同类型农业生态系统, 尤其是梨园种植区生育期内作物系数的变化及蒸散规律研究并不充分。本研究针对华北平原典型的冬小麦-夏玉米农田生态系统、棉田生态系统和梨园生态系统, 基于FAO56手册推荐的单作物系数法计算和验证了2016—2017年各农业生态系统初始生长期至生育末期的实际蒸散量, 分析了不同生育阶段蒸散变化规律。不同作物初始生长期、快速发育期、生育中期和生育末期作物系数, 冬小麦分别为0.60、0.88、1.07和0.72, 夏玉米分别为0.46、0.76、1.01和0.80, 棉花分别为0.34、0.71、1.07和0.78, 梨树分别为0.81、0.91、1.02和0.96。冬小麦-夏玉米、棉田和梨园的单作物系数法计算的实际蒸散量分别为694.3 mm、472.2 mm和825.7 mm。3类作物生育期内实际蒸散量计算值比实测值分别低1.0%、低4.9%和高8.1%, 变化趋势一致, 相关系数为0.80~0.91 (P<0.01)。粮、棉和果树生态系统是华北平原农业生态系统的典型代表, 本研究不仅明确了各类作物尤其是研究比较缺乏的梨树的不同生育期内的作物系数, 同时利用涡度相关实测结果进行了同时空尺度的验证, 明确了单作物系数法在华北平原不同农业生态系统的适用性, 为制定合理灌溉计划、实现作物耗水精准管理提供科学依据。Abstract: The crop coefficient method recommended by FAO56 is a method to calculate the actual evapotranspiration of crops, which can simply and accurately reflect the evapotranspiration patterns and characteristics of different agroecosystems during different growth stages. Although the crop coefficient method is widely used, there are still some problems in applying this method in the North China Plain. Research on a single agroecosystem of winter wheat-summer maize has been conducted for a long time. However, there is a lack of systematic and comprehensive research on the evapotranspiration patterns of various typical agroecosystems in the North China Plain through the single crop coefficient method. Therefore, it is difficult to provide quantitative theoretical support for water consumption management and planting structure adjustment. Furthermore, the variation in crop coefficients for the typical pear orchard agroecosystem, the main fruit and the most important economic crop in the North China Plain, is urgently needed. In this study, the crop coefficients and evapotranspiration patterns of different growth stages of irrigated crops in the typical agroecosystems of winter wheat-summer maize farmland, cotton field, and pear orchard in the North China Plain were examined and verified from 2016 to 2017. The entire growth stage was divided into initial, developing, mid, and end stages based on the crop growth stages and physiological characteristics. According to the single crop coefficient method recorded in FAO56 manual, the average crop coefficients of the initial, developing, mid, and end stages of different crops were 0.60, 0.88, 1.07, and 0.72 for winter wheat; 0.46, 0.76, 1.01, and 0.80 for summer maize; 0.34, 0.71, 1.07, and 0.78 for cotton; 0.81, 0.91, 1.02, and 0.96 for pear trees, respectively; while the calculated actual evapotranspiration was 694.3 mm, 472.2 mm, and 825.7 mm for the above three ecosystems, respectively. Evapotranspiration measured by the eddy covariance systems was 701.4 mm, 496.5 mm, and 763.5 mm for winter wheat-summer maize, cotton field, and pear orchard agroecosystems, respectively. Both the calculated and measured actual evapotranspiration values of the four crops showed a single-peak change from the initial to the end stages, with the same trend. The correlation coefficients between the calculated and measured evapotranspiration for all three agroecosystems were greater than 0.8. The calculated actual evapotranspiration values compared to the measured values during the growth stage of winter wheat-summer maize, cotton, and pear orchard agroecosystems were 1.0% lower, 4.9% lower, and 8.1% higher, respectively. This study not only provided the crop coefficients of wheat, maize, and cotton but also filled the gap in the research on crop coefficient of pear trees in this region. It is particularly important that this study used the observed evapotranspiration by the eddy correlation system to verify the calculated evapotranspiration using the single crop coefficient method at the same spatial and temporal scale, which shows the applicability of the calculated crop coefficients in the region. The applicability of the single-crop coefficient method in different agroecosystems in the North China Plain was clarified. This research provides a scientific basis for making reasonable irrigation plans and achieving precise management of crop water consumption.
-
图 1 涡度相关系统及土壤水分传感器布置示意图
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of eddy covariance system and soil moisture sensors
图 2 梨树生育期内土壤水分胁迫系数(Ks)变化
Figure 2. Soil water stress coefficients (Ks) during growth period of pear trees
图 3 不同农业生态系统的作物生育期平均温度(Ini: 初始生长期; Dev: 快速发育期; Mid: 生育中期; End: 生育末期)
Figure 3. Average temperature of different crops at different growth stages in different agroecosystems (Ini: initial stage; Dev: developing stage; Mid: mid stage; End: end stage)
图 4 不同农业生态系统生育期降水量、平均相对湿度和风速变化
Figure 4. Changes of precipitation, average relative humidity and wind speed at different growth stages of corps of different agroecosystems
图 5 不同农业生态系统作物生育期内参考蒸散量(ET0)变化(Ini: 初始生长期; Dev: 快速发育期; Mid: 生育中期; End: 生育末期)
Figure 5. Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) variations during growth stages of different agrecosystems (Ini: initial stage; Dev: developing stage; Mid: mid stage; End: end stage)
图 6 不同农业生态系统作物生育期内实际蒸散量(ETEC)变化(Ini:初始生长期; Dev: 快速发育期; Mid: 生育中期; End: 生育末期)
Figure 6. Actual evapotranspiration (ETEC) variations during growth stages of different agrecosystems (Ini: initial stage; Dev: developing stage; Mid: mid stage; End: end stage)
图 7 不同农业生态系统生育期内作物系数法计算的实际蒸散量(ETa-FAo)变化(Ini: 初始生长期; Dev: 快速发育期; Mid: 生育中期; End: 生育末期)
Figure 7. Calculated actural evapotranspiration (ETa-FAO) variations during crop growth stages of different agroecosystems (Ini: initial stage; Dev: developing stage; Mid: mid stage; End: end stage)
图 8 不同农业生态系统实际蒸散量实测值与计算值相关性验证
Figure 8. Verification of correlation between measured (ETEC) and calculated (ETa-FAO) actural evapotranspiration of different agroecosystems
表 1 不同试验站点(农业生态系统)种植作物和土壤性质
Table 1. Detail information of plants and soil property in different experimental sites (agroecosytems)
试验站点
Experiment site地理坐标
Geographical coordinate作物类型
Crop type土壤性质 Soil property 田间持水量
Field capacity
(%)凋萎系数
Wilting point of
soil moisture (%)碱解氮
Available nitrogen (mg∙kg−1)速效磷
Available phosphorus (mg∙kg−1)速效钾
Available potassium (mg∙kg−1)栾城 Luancheng 37°53′N, 114°41′E 冬小麦-夏玉米
Winter wheat-summer maize34 12 60~80 15~20 150~170 深州 Shenzhou 37°47′N, 114°55′E 棉花 Cotton 28 11 80 21 180 赵县 Zhaoxian 37°54′N, 115°42′E 梨树 Pear 35 13 70 19 257 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同作物生育阶段(月-日)划分
Table 2. Division of growth stages (month-day) of crops of different agroecosystems
作物 Crop 初始生长期 Initial stage 快速发育期 Developing stage 生育中期 Mid stage 生育末期 End stage 冬小麦 Winter wheat 10-06—03-17 03-18—05-02 05-03—05-28 05-29—06-12 夏玉米 Summer maize 06-13—07-19 07-20—08-31 09-01—09-18 09-19—09-27 棉花 Cotton 05-01—06-15 06-16—07-15 07-16—09-30 10-01—10-25 梨树 Pear 03-01—03-31 04-01—06-30 07-01—08-31 09-01—10-31
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同作物各生育阶段查表所得作物系数(Kc-Tab)取值
Table 3. Crop coefficient (Kc-Tab) values of different growth stages of crops
生育期
Growth stage冬小麦
Winter wheat夏玉米
Summer maize棉花
Cotton梨树
Pear初始生长期 Initial stage 0.60 0.47 0.35 0.80 生育中期 Mid stage 1.07 1.11 1.15 1.20 生育末期 End stage 0.70 0.83 0.60 0.85
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同农业生态系统作物不同生育阶段及总参考作物蒸散量
Table 4. Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) of different crops at different growth stages and during whole growth stage of different agroecosystems
mm 作物
Crop初始生长期
Initial stage快速发育期
Developing stage生育中期
Mid stage生育末期
End stage总计
Total冬小麦
Winter wheat187.2 140.6 127.8 74.8 530.4 夏玉米
Summer maize190.4 141.5 51.0 26.0 408.6 棉花 Cotton 248.2 158.5 232.2 34.2 673.1 梨树 Pear 78.8 426.5 246.5 128.7 880.5
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 不同农业生态系统作物不同生育阶段及总实际蒸散量
Table 5. Actural evapotranspiration of different crops at different growth stages and during whole growth stage of different agroecosystems
mm 作物
Crop初始生长期
Initial stage快速发育期
Developing stage生育中期
Mid stage生育末期
End stage总计
Total冬小麦
Winter wheat125.1 123.4 110.8 43.2 402.5 夏玉米
Summer maize92.5 134.4 52.8 19.2 298.9 棉花 Cotton 86.7 149.6 236.0 24.2 496.5 梨树 Pear 33.9 355.3 263.7 110.6 763.5
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 不同农业生态系统作物不同生育阶段平均作物系数
Table 6. Average crop coefficient (Kc) in different growth stages of crops in different agroecosystems
作物
Crop初始生长期
Initial stage快速发育期
Developing stage生育中期
Mid stage生育末期
End stage冬小麦
Winter wheat0.60 0.88 1.07 0.72 夏玉米
Summer maize0.46 0.76 1.01 0.80 棉花 Cotton 0.34 0.71 1.07 0.78 梨树 Pear 0.81 0.91 1.02 0.96
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] SUN H Y, SHEN Y J, YU Q, et al. Effect of precipitation change on water balance and WUE of the winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(8): 1139−1145 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.004 [2] ZHANG Y C, LEI H M, ZHAO W G, et al. Comparison of the water budget for the typical cropland and pear orchard ecosystems in the North China Plain[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 198: 53−64 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.027 [3] 张雅芳, 郭英, 沈彦俊, 等. 华北平原种植结构变化对农业需水的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(1): 8−16ZHANG Y F, GUO Y, SHEN Y J, et al. Impact of planting structure changes on agricultural water requirement in North China Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(1): 8−16 [4] 康绍忠. 旱区水-土-作物关系及其最优调控原理[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998KANG S Z. Water-Soil-Crop Relation and Its Optimum Regulation in Arid and Semiarid Areas[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 1998 [5] 王振龙, 刘竹梅, 吕海深, 等. 基于修正遗传算法的夏玉米作物系数及蒸散发估算[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(1): 108−116WANG Z L, LIU Z M, LYU H S, et al. Estimation of summer maize crop coefficient and evapotranspiration based on modified genetic algorithm[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(1): 108−116 [6] ALLEN R G, PEREIRA L S, RAES D, et al. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements[J]. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 56, FAO, 1998: 56 [7] GUO H, LI S E, KANG S Z, et al. Crop coefficient for spring maize under plastic mulch based on 12-year eddy covariance observation in the arid region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 588: 125108 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125108 [8] YANG P J, HU H C, TIAN F Q, et al. Crop coefficient for cotton under plastic mulch and drip irrigation based on eddy covariance observation in an arid area of Northwestern China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 171: 21−30 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.007 [9] 牛建龙, 王家强, 彭杰, 等. 荒漠-绿洲区潜在蒸散量变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(4): 766−772NIU J L, WANG J Q, PENG J, et al. Change of potential evapotranspiration and its affecting factors in desert-oasis zone[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(4): 766−772 [10] KANG S Z, GU B J, DU T S, et al. Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2003, 59(3): 239−254 doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00150-6 [11] WANG Y F, CAI H J, YU L Y, et al. Evapotranspiration partitioning and crop coefficient of maize in dry semi-humid climate regime[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 236: 106164 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106164 [12] GONG X W, QIU R J, SUN J S, et al. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of tomato grown in a solar greenhouse under full and deficit irrigation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 235: 106154 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106154 [13] WANG S T, ZHU G F, XIA D S, et al. The characteristics of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of an irrigated vineyard in arid Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212: 388−398 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.023 [14] XU G P, XUE X Z, WANG P, et al. A lysimeter study for the effects of different canopy sizes on evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of summer maize[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 208: 1−6 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.040 [15] WANG J D, ZHANG Y Q, GONG S H, et al. Evapotranspiration, crop coefficient and yield for drip-irrigated winter wheat with straw mulching in North China Plain[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 217: 218−228 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.010 [16] 宿梅双, 李久生, 饶敏杰. 基于称重式蒸渗仪的喷灌条件下冬小麦和糯玉米作物系数估算方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(8): 25−29 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2005.08.006SU M S, LI J S, RAO M J. Estimation of crop coefficients for sprinkler-irrigated winter wheat and sweet corn using a weighing lysimeter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(8): 25−29 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2005.08.006 [17] 韩淑敏, 程一松, 胡春胜. 太行山山前平原作物系数与降水年型关系探讨[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(5): 152−158 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2005.05.030HAN S M, CHENG Y S, HU C S. Relationship between crop coefficient and precipitation pattern in the piedmont of Mt. Taihang[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005, 23(5): 152−158 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2005.05.030 [18] 张喜英, 陈素英, 裴冬, 等. 秸秆覆盖下的夏玉米蒸散、水分利用效率和作物系数的变化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(6): 583−592 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2002.06.008ZHANG X Y, CHEN S Y, PEI D, et al. Evapotranspiration, yield and crop coefficient of irrigated maize under straw mulch conditions[J]. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(6): 583−592 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2002.06.008 [19] 李艳梅, 廖上强, 杨俊刚, 等. 温室芹菜需水强度与作物系数研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2016(12): 54–58, 63LI Y M, LIAO S Q, YANG J G, et al. Analysis of water requirement rate and crop coefficient for greenhouse celery under well-irrigated condition[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2016(12): 54–58, 63 [20] 苗文芳, 刘秀位, 邵立威, 等. 金丝小枣蒸散和作物系数变化规律研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2013, 32(1): 77−81MIAO W F, LIU X W, SHAO L W, et al. Daily transpiration, evaporation and crop coefficient of Ziziphus jujube[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2013, 32(1): 77−81 [21] 李春, 何洪林, 刘敏, 等. ChinaFLUX CO2通量数据处理系统与应用[J]. 地球信息科学, 2008, 10(5): 557−565LI C, HE H L, LIU M, et al. The design and application of CO2 flux data processing system at ChinaFLUX[J]. Geo-Information Science, 2008, 10(5): 557−565 [22] 张玉翠, 姜寒冰, 张传伟, 等. 2007—2013年华北平原典型灌溉农田生态系统日通量数据集−以栾城站为例[J]. 中国科学数据, 2020, 5(2): 40−50ZHANG Y C, JIANG H B, ZHANG C W, et al. Daily fluxes dataset of the typical irrigated agro-ecosystem in the North China Plain: a case study of Luancheng Station (2007−2013)[J]. China Scientific Data, 2020, 5(2): 40−50 [23] SHEN Y J, ZHANG Y C, SCANLON B R, et al. Energy/water budgets and productivity of the typical croplands irrigated with groundwater and surface water in the North China Plain[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2013, 181: 133−142 [24] 段爱旺. 北方地区主要农作物灌溉用水定额[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004DUAN A W. Irrigation Water Quota for Major Crops in the Northern Region[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2004 [25] LI S E, KANG S Z, LI F S, et al. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of spring maize with plastic mulch using eddy covariance in northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(11): 1214−1222 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.04.014 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 472
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 64
- 被引次数: 0
