留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

直灌咸水与施氮磷对重盐碱柽柳地的改良效应

杨莉琳 杨友山 李铃蔓 邱发根 朱向梅

杨莉琳, 杨友山, 李铃蔓, 邱发根, 朱向梅. 直灌咸水与施氮磷对重盐碱柽柳地的改良效应[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2022, 30(8): 1372−1380 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20210669
引用本文: 杨莉琳, 杨友山, 李铃蔓, 邱发根, 朱向梅. 直灌咸水与施氮磷对重盐碱柽柳地的改良效应[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2022, 30(8): 1372−1380 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20210669
YANG L L, YANG Y S, LI L M, QIU F G, ZHU X M. Effects of direct saline irrigation and nitrogen and phosphorus application on a coastal saline-alkali soil planted Tamarix chinensis[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(8): 1372−1380 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20210669
Citation: YANG L L, YANG Y S, LI L M, QIU F G, ZHU X M. Effects of direct saline irrigation and nitrogen and phosphorus application on a coastal saline-alkali soil planted Tamarix chinensis[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(8): 1372−1380 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20210669

直灌咸水与施氮磷对重盐碱柽柳地的改良效应

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20210669
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(31270521)、贵州省教育厅创新群体重大研究项目(黔教合KY字[2016]053号)、贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合基础[2019]1312)、铜仁学院博士基金项目(trxyDH1525)和农业生态创新团队项目(CXTD[2020-10])以及2019贵州省一流本科专业建设(教高厅函[2019]46号)资助
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    杨莉琳, 主要研究方向为土壤养分循环与环境生态。E-mail: yangllin@sjziam.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: S153; S147.2; Q945.78

Effects of direct saline irrigation and nitrogen and phosphorus application on a coastal saline-alkali soil planted Tamarix chinensis

Funds: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270521), the Major Research Project of Innovation Group of Guizhou Education Department (Qian Education No. [2016] 053), the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guizhou Province (Qian Science No. [2019] 1312), the Doctoral Fund Project of Tongren University (trxyDH1525), the Agro-ecological Innovation Research Group of Tongren University (CXTD[2020-10]), and the 2019 Classic Undergraduate Course Construction in Guizhou Province (Advanced Education Department Document [2019] No. 46).
More Information
  • 摘要: 为解决滨海重盐碱地春旱、返盐以及缺N、贫P的突出问题, 利用当地丰富的地下咸水资源和柽柳固C、排盐的特性, 在华北低平原区滨海重盐碱区人工柽柳地开展了为期4年的咸水[不灌水和灌溉地下咸水(含盐量8.02~9.34 g·L−1, W)]与NP [不施肥(CK、WCK), 单施氮(N、WN)和施氮磷(NP、WNP)]的2因素定位试验, 研究不同处理对土壤盐分、养分和微生物量碳和微生物量氮的影响, 以达到生物改良盐碱地、提升绿色生态景观的目标。研究结果显示, 柽柳地首次灌溉咸水, 0~30 cm土壤盐分平均下降32.7%; 但连续3年灌溉咸水柽柳地0~30 cm土层盐分平均上升11.2%~18.3%; 0~90 cm土壤有效磷(Olsen-P)含量下降19.4%~32.1%, 0~30 cm 微生物量碳与微生物量氮含量显著下降。灌溉咸水条件下施用NP (WNP)比对照(WCK)的0~30 cm土层的含盐量下降36.1%, 土壤0~30 cm全氮、含水量和30~60 cm的Olsen-P含量均显著下降; 而0~30 cm土层有机质、微生物量碳和有效钾含量显著提升。P是滨海重盐碱地关键限制性营养元素, 灌溉咸水促进了柽柳对P吸收, 进一步加剧土壤P消耗; 灌溉咸水并施NP (WNP)可缓解滨海重盐碱柽柳地营养元素匮乏的限制, 激活土壤微生物活性, 有效降低因连续直灌咸水引发的土壤次生盐渍化的风险。研究结果为重盐碱地人工柽柳咸水灌溉及养分管理提供依据。
  • 图  1  灌溉咸水与施NP对柽柳地不同深度土壤有效磷含量的影响

    CK: 不灌咸水不施肥; N: 不灌咸水施N; NP: 不灌咸水施NP; WCK: 灌咸水不施肥; WN: 灌咸水施N; WNP: 灌咸水施NP。括号左边的*表示灌溉咸水与不灌咸水组间的差异, 括号内的不同符号或字母表示不同施肥处理间的差异, 括号右边的*表示咸水×施肥的交互作用; *和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平差异显著; ns表示差异不显著。

    Figure  1.  Impact f saline water irrigation-associated fertilization of N and P on soil Olsen-P content in different depths of Tamarix chinensis field

    CK: neither irrigation nor fertilization; N: N fertilization without irrigation; NP: N and P fertilization without irrigation; WCK: no fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WN: N fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WNP: N and P fertilization with irrigation of saline water. * outside left the parentheses indicates difference between the average of two irrigation treatments (i.e. without irrigation or with saline irrigation) for a particular soil depth; different symbol or letters inside the parentheses indicate differences among average of fertilization treatments for a particular soil depth; * outside right the parentheses indicate interaction of the irrigation and fertilization for a particular soil depth. * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively; “ns” indicates no significant difference.

    表  1  试验地土壤基本理化性状

    Table  1.   Basic physical and chemical properties of soil for planting Tamarix chinensis

    土层
    Soil layer
    (cm)
    pH电导率
    Electric conductivity
    (dS∙m−1)
    含盐量
    Salt content
    (g∙kg−1)
    有机质
    Organic matter
    (g∙kg−1)
    全氮
    Total N
    (g∙kg−1)
    硝态氮
    NO3-N
    (mg∙kg−1)
    有效磷
    Olsen-P
    (mg∙kg−1)
    有效钾
    Available K
    (mg∙kg−1)
    0~308.131.665.008.130.664.08 7.00186.8
    30~608.081.725.298.140.563.44 6.91164.7
    60~908.011.966.008.210.600.2612.70227.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  灌溉咸水与施NP对柽柳地不同深度土壤盐分含量的影响

    Table  2.   Impact of saline irrigation-associated fertilization of N and P on salt contents of different soil depths of Tamarix chinensis field

    处理
    Treatment
    第1年7月 July of the first year第3年4月 April of the third year第4年6月 June of the forth year
    0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm
    g∙kg−1 
    CK5.0±0.15.4±0.65.4±0.54.1±0.45.0±0.15.7±0.14.3±0.24.5±0.65.6±0.3
    N5.5±0.44.7±1.15.5±1.14.2±0.25.0±0.26.1±0.34.2±0.75.1±0.35.3±0.5
    NP4.8±2.03.4±1.03.8±0.74.3±0.14.8±0.25.5±0.34.6±0.24.5±0.26.5±0.7
    WCK3.5±0.54.1±0.24.9±0.45.1±0.15.8±0.2a5.9±0.2a6.1±0.8a5.1±0.85.0±0.2
    WN3.3±0.54.0±0.74.4±0.64.5±0.35.1±0.1b5.8±0.4ab5.5±0.2ab4.4±0.24.8±0.4
    WNP3.5±1.03.7±0.84.3±0.64.4±0.45.4±0.1ab5.7±0.4b3.9±0.4b4.8±0.35.2±0.4
    差异来源分析 Analysis of variance
    W*nsns**ns*nsns
    Fnsnsnsnsnsns*nsns
    W×Fnsnsns***ns*nsns
      CK: 不灌咸水不施肥; N: 不灌咸水施N; NP: 不灌咸水施NP; WCK: 灌咸水不施肥; WN: 灌咸水施N; WNP: 灌咸水施NP; W: 灌水处理; F: 施肥处理; W×F: 咸水与施肥的交互效应。同列2个水处理组内的不同施肥处理(CK, N, NP或WCK, WN, WNP)标注不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平差异显著, 没有标注字母的表示差异不显著。*和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平差异显著; ns表示差异不显著。CK: neither irrigation nor fertilization; N: N fertilization without irrigation; NP: N and P fertilization without irrigation; WCK: no fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WN: N fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WNP: N and P fertilization with irrigation of saline water; W: saline water irrigation; F: fertilization; W×F: interaction of saline water irrigation and fertilization. Different lowercase letters or no letters respectively indicate significant differences at P<0.05 level or no difference among treatments of fertilization without irrigation (i.e. CK, N and NP) or with saline irrigation (i.e. WCK, WN and WNP). * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively; “ns” indicates no significant difference.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  灌溉咸水与施NP对柽柳地不同深度土壤微生物量碳氮的影响

    Table  3.   Impact of saline irrigation-associated fertilization of N and P on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen contents in different depths of Tamarix chinensis field

    处理
    Treatment
    微生物碳 Microbiol biomanss C (mg·kg−1)微生物氮 Microbiol biomass N (mg·kg−1)微生物量碳/微生物量氮 Microbiol biomass C/N
    0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm
    CK268.9±23.2b235.2±22.2212.5±42.0102.7±9.0b55.0±1.5b33.7±13.2c2.84.36.1
    N319.7±43.7a274.9±52.9175.3±32.7104.3±2.7b69.3±6.4ab52.7±9.4b3.03.73.6
    NP326.9±6.9a298.6±9.7245.9±6.1135.7±2.7a73.0±10.6a81.7±7.4a2.34.13.0
    WCK223.0±16.1b214.7±39.2227.2±20.9a87.3±5.851.0±3.2b23.3±2.7c2.65.09.7
    WN254.4±9.2ab251.9±5.4164.0±20.6b90.0±3.671.0±4.0a50.3±8.1b2.83.03.3
    WNP296.6±10.5a245.2±46.5236.8±8.1a97.0±4.676.0±3.8a83.0±2.1a3.13.22.9
    差异来源分析 Analysis of variance
    W**nsns*nsns
    F**ns*******
    W×F**nsns*****
      CK: 不灌咸水不施肥; N: 不灌咸水施N; NP: 不灌咸水施NP; WCK: 灌咸水不施肥; WN: 灌咸水施N; WNP: 灌咸水施NP; W: 灌水处理; F: 施肥处理; W×F: 咸水与施肥的交互效应。同列2个水处理组内的不同施肥处理(CK, N, NP或WCK, WN, WNP)标注不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平差异显著, 没有标注字母的表示差异不显著。*和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平差异显著; ns表示差异不显著。CK: neither irrigation nor fertilization; N: N fertilization without irrigation; NP: N and P fertilization without irrigation; WCK: no fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WN: N fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WNP: N and P fertilization with irrigation of saline water; W: saline water irrigation; F: fertilization; W×F: interaction of saline water irrigation and fertilization. Different lowercase letters or no letters respectively indicate significant differences at P<0.05 level or no difference among treatments of fertilization without irrigation (i.e. CK, N and NP) or with saline irrigation (i.e. WCK, WN and WNP). * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively; “ns” indicates no significant difference.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  灌溉咸水与施NP对柽柳地不同深度土壤全氮、硝态氮和土壤水含量的影响

    Table  4.   Impact of saline water irrigation-associated fertilization of N and P on contents of total N, nitrate N and water in different soil depths of Tamarix chinensis field

    处理
    Treatment
    全氮 Total N (g·kg−1)硝态氮 NO3-N (mg·kg−1)含水量 Soil moisture (%)
    0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm
    CK 0.85±0.01 0.78±0.01 1.06±0.04a 3.22±0.05B 2.58±0.03b 2.52±0.01 17.7±1.56b 20.5±1.4 22.1±0.2
    N 0.72±0.01 0.78±0.08 0.96±0.09ab 9.43±0.08A 5.23±0.01a 2.69±0.01 21.3±0.49a 22.4±0.6 22.4±0.2
    NP 0.74±0.06 0.78±0.05 0.79±0.06b 6.34±0.04AB 5.41±0.04a 2.71±0.02 19.3±0.11ab 20.5±0.1 22.2±0.1
    WCK 0.77±0.05AB 0.81±0.02 0.98±0.04a 1.57±0.01B 2.66±0.01b 2.34±0.01b 20.9±0.66a 21.1±0.3 22.5±0.1a
    WN 0.83±0.08A 0.79±0.07 0.79±0.10b 4.21±0.06AB 5.93±0.03a 3.74±0.01a 18.3±0.36b 20.2±0.3 21.3±0.2b
    WNP 0.61±0.03B 0.73±0.07 0.84±0.03ab 5.93±0.02A 5.48±0.04a 3.44±0.02a 18.4±0.69b 21.3±0.8 22.0±0.3a
    差异来源分析 Analysis of variance
    W ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
    F * ns * ** ** * ** ns ns
    W×F * ns * * * ns * ns ns
      CK: 不灌咸水不施肥; N: 不灌咸水施N; NP: 不灌咸水施NP; WCK: 灌咸水不施肥; WN: 灌咸水施N; WNP: 灌咸水施NP; W: 灌水处理; F: 施肥处理; W×F: 咸水与施肥的交互效应。同列2个水处理组内的不同施肥处理(CK, N, NP或WCK, WN, WNP)标注不同小写或大写字母分别表示在P<0.05或P<0.01水平差异显著, 没有标注字母的表示差异不显著。*和** 分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平差异显著; ns表示差异不显著。CK: neither irrigation nor fertilization; N: N fertilization without irrigation; NP: N and P fertilization without irrigation; WCK: no fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WN: N fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WNP: N and P fertilization with irrigation of saline water; W: saline water irriggation; F: fertilization; W×F: interaction of saline water irrigation and fertilization. Different lowercase or capital letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05 or P<0.01 level among fertilizer treatments without irrigation (i.e. CK, N and NP) or with saline irrigation (i.e. WCK, WN and WNP), and no letter indicate no difference. * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively; “ns” indicates no significant difference.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  灌溉咸水与施NP对柽柳地不同深度土壤有效钾和有机质含量的影响

    Table  5.   Impact of saline water irrigation-associated fertilization of N and P on available K and organic matter contents in different soil depths of Tamarix chinensis field

    处理
    Treatment
    有效钾 Available K (mg∙kg−1)有机质 Organic matter (g∙kg−1)
    0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm0~30 cm30~60 cm60~90 cm
    CK171.4±13.11ab205.1±7.83A237.1±8.248.8±0.918.0±0.1610.5±0.92
    N163.6±6.08b155.0±18.78B231.7±14.008.6±0.278.0±1.2610.1±1.60
    NP190.6±14.98a183.7±15.82AB250.7±13.329.7±1.058.5±0.2210.0±1.90
    WCK175.5±2.45B185.9±2.11 a267.0±32.258.5±0.94B10.0±0.39ab11.8±0.42
    WN173.0±8.45B152.3±4.99b251.9±18.8410.3±0.26AB11.7±1.14a12.3±0.96
    WNP269.8±21.6A179.5±9.2ab212.9±27.6412.3±1.0A8.9±0.51b11.3±0.75
    差异来源分析 Analysis of variance
    Wnsnsns*****
    F****ns**nsns
    W×Fns*ns***ns
      CK: 不灌咸水不施肥; N: 不灌咸水施N; NP: 不灌咸水施NP; WCK: 灌咸水不施肥; WN: 灌咸水施N; WNP: 灌咸水施NP; W: 灌水处理; F: 施肥处理; W×F: 咸水与施肥的交互效应。同列2个水处理组内的不同施肥处理(CK, N, NP或WCK, WN, WNP)标注不同小写字母或大写字母表示在P<0.05或P<0.01水平差异显著, 没有标注字母的表示差异不显著。*和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平差异显著; ns表示差异不显著。CK: neither irrigation nor fertilization; N: N fertilization without irrigation; NP: N and P fertilization without irrigation; WCK: no fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WN: N fertilization with irrigation of saline water; WNP: N and P fertilization with irrigation of saline water; W: saline water irriggation; F: fertilization; W×F: interaction of saline water irrigation and fertilization. Different lowercase or capital letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05 or P<0.01 level among treatments of fertilization without irrigation (i.e. CK, N and NP) or with saline irrigation (i.e. WCK, WN and WNP), and no letter indicates no difference. * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively; “ns” indicates no significant difference.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] LI C F, YANG F, ZHENG X Q, et al. Changes in distribution and morphology of Tamarix ramosissima Nebkhas in an oasis-desert ecotone[J]. Geosciences Journal, 2021, 25(5): 661−673 doi: 10.1007/s12303-020-0054-3
    [2] 程文娟, 潘洁, 肖辉, 等. 咸水结冰灌溉结合改良剂对滨海盐土的改良作用[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(4): 778−782 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00778

    CHENG W J, PAN J, XIAO H, et al. Effect of combined frozen saline water irrigation and soil amendment on coastal saline land reclamation[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(4): 778−782 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00778
    [3] XIA J B, ZHAO X M, CHEN Y P, et al. Responses of water and salt parameters to groundwater levels for soil columns planted with Tamarix chinensis[J]. PLOS One, 2016, 11(1): 1−15
    [4] LIU Z Y, LI X P, ZHANG T Q, et al. Overexpression of ThMYB8 mediates salt stress tolerance by directly activating stress-responsive gene expression[J]. Plant Science, 2021, 302: 1−18
    [5] LI X Q, XIA J B, ZHAO X M, et al. Effects of planting Tamarix chinensis on shallow soil water and salt content under different groundwater depths in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 335: 104−111 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.017
    [6] ZHAO X M, XIA J B, CHEN W F, et al. Transport characteristics of salt ions in soil columns planted with Tamarix chinensis under different groundwater levels[J]. PLOS One, 2019, 14(4): 1−17
    [7] 邱发根, 杨莉琳, 刘敏, 等. 直灌咸水与施氮磷对滨海重盐碱地柽柳生长及养分分布的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(10): 1712−1721

    QIU F G, YANG L L, LIU M, et al. Impact of saline irrigation and application of N and P on growth and nutrient distribution of Tamarix chinensis planted in coastal saline-alkali soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(10): 1712−1721
    [8] VANCE E D, BROOKES P C, JENKINSON D S. Nitrogen and carbon for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703−707 doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
    [9] HUSSAIN T, LI X G, FENG X H, et al. Soil respiration and photosynthetic carbon gain on an abundant coastal land after plantation of Tamarix chinensis[M]. GRIGORE M N. Handbook of Halophytes. Cham: Springer, 2020, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17854-3_47-1
    [10] REN D Y, XU X, RAMOS T B, et al. Modeling and assessing the function and sustainability of natural patches in salt-affected agro-ecosystems: Application to tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis Lour.) in Hetao, upper Yellow River basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 552: 490−504 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.054
    [11] 肖克飚, 吴普特, 雷金银, 等. 不同类型耐盐植物对盐碱土生物改良研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(12): 2433−2440

    XIAO K B, WU P T, LEI J Y, et al. Bio-reclamation of different halophytes on saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(12): 2433−2440
    [12] 宋战超, 夏江宝, 赵西梅, 等. 不同地下水矿化度条件下柽柳土柱的水盐分布特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(2): 41−48

    SONG Z C, XIA J B, ZHAO X M, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil moisture and salinity in the soil columns with planting Tamarix chinensis under different groundwater mineralization[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 14(2): 41−48
    [13] FENG X H, AN P, LI X G, et al. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of soil water and salinity after establishment of dense-foliage Tamarix chinensis on coastal saline land[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 121: 104−113 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.031
    [14] 李从娟, 唐俊姸, 高培, 等. 咸水灌溉对沙漠防护林植物根系分布及风沙土演变的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(5): 1180−1187

    LI C J, TANG J Y, GAO P, et al. Effect of irrigation with saline water on plant root distribution and evolution of aeolian sandy soil in shelterbelts along the Taklimakan desert highway[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(5): 1180−1187
    [15] YANG L L, ZHANG F S, GAO Q, et al. Impact of land-use types on soil nitrogen net mineralization in the sandstorm and water source area of Beijing, China[J]. CATENA, 2010, 82(1): 15−22 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2010.04.004
    [16] 魏新燕, 刘小京. 咸水结冰灌溉对滨海盐碱地不同植被根区土壤微生物的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2014, 37(1): 22−26

    WEI X Y, LIU X J. Microbial ecological characteristics of planted saline-alkali soil in coastal saline area by freezing saline water irrigation[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2014, 37(1): 22−26
    [17] CLEVELAND C C, TOWNSEND A R, TAYLOR P, et al. Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a Pan-tropical analysis[J]. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14(9): 939−947 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01658.x
    [18] GROSS A, TIWARI S, SHTEIN I, et al. Direct foliar uptake of phosphorus from desert dust[J]. The New Phytologist, 2021, 230(6): 2213−2225 doi: 10.1111/nph.17344
    [19] YANG L L, DING X Q, LIU X J, et al. Impacts of long-term jujube tree/winter wheat-summer maize intercropping on soil fertility and economic efficiency — A case study in the lower North China Plain[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016, 75: 105−117 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.01.008
    [20] XU G, SHAO H B, SUN J N, et al. Phosphorus fractions and profile distribution in newly formed wetland soils along a salinity gradient in the Yellow River Delta in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2012, 175(5): 721−728 doi: 10.1002/jpln.201100307
    [21] 中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所. 滨海重盐碱地柽柳直接扦插成林的方法: 中国, 201110231187.2[P/OL]. [2013-01-02]. http://www.soopat.com/Patent/201110231187?lx=FMSQ

    Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Method for planting Tamarix chinensis cutting in coastal saline soil: China, 201110231187.2[P/OL]. [2013-01-02]. http://www.soopat.com/Patent/201110231187?lx=FMSQ
    [22] YIN C H, FENG G, ZHANG F S, et al. Enrichment of soil fertility and salinity by tamarisk in saline soils on the northern edge of the Taklamakan Desert[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(12): 1978−1986 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.02.013
    [23] 雷金银, 班乃荣, 张永宏, 等. 柽柳对盐碱土养分与盐分的影响及其区化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(2): 73−76

    LEI J Y, BAN N R, ZHANG Y H, et al. Effects and partition characteristics of Tamarix ramosissima on nutrients and salt of saline-alkali soils[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(2): 73−76
    [24] 李晓光, 郭凯, 封晓辉, 等. 滨海盐渍区不同土地利用方式土壤-植被系统碳储量研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(11): 1580−1590

    LI X G, GUO K, FENG X H, et al. Carbon storage of soil-vegetation system under different land use patterns in saline coastal regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(11): 1580−1590
    [25] 关洪斌, 王晓兰, 鞠迪. 柽柳对滨海盐渍土的改良作用及其应用[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2009, 25(10): 918−921 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2009.10.017

    GUAN H B, WANG X L, JU D. Soiled modification and application of Tamarix chinensis on the saline soil[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2009, 25(10): 918−921 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2009.10.017
    [26] XIE L P, WANG B D, XIN M, et al. Impacts of coppicing on Tamarix chinensis growth and carbon stocks in coastal wetlands in Northern China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 147: 105760 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105760
    [27] CONANT R T, RYAN M G, ÅGREN G I, et al. Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates — synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17: 3392−3404 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x
    [28] JOHNSON A H, FRIZANO J, VANN D R. Biogeochemical implications of labile phosphorus in forest soils determined by the Hedley fractionation procedure[J]. Oecologia, 2003, 135(4): 487−499 doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1164-5
    [29] WRIGHT S J, YAVITT J B, WURZBURGER N, et al. Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest[J]. Ecology, 2011, 92(8): 1616−1625 doi: 10.1890/10-1558.1
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  135
  • HTML全文浏览量:  50
  • PDF下载量:  34
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-10-12
  • 录用日期:  2021-12-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-01-26
  • 刊出日期:  2022-08-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回