Quality and quantity characteristics of saline ice meltwater under different pretreatments
-
摘要: 咸水结冰灌溉对重度盐碱地改良, 缓解淡水资源短缺具有重要现实意义。咸水冰融化过程中水盐分离的实质是盐分的再分配过程。为厘清前处理对咸水冰融化过程中水质及水量的影响, 本研究设计了曝气冰(A)、堆积冰(S)、破碎冰(C)和常规冰(R) 4种前处理, 及4个初始矿化度(0、5 g∙L−1、10 g∙L−1、15 g∙L−1), 对比分析融水过程中水量和水质的动态变化。结果表明, 曝气、堆积和破碎处理相对常规冰都能显著减少融化时间, 各处理融化时间为破碎冰<堆积冰<曝气冰<常规冰; 单位时间融出水量均呈先快速升高, 后缓慢降低的趋势, 峰值水量为常规冰<曝气冰<堆积冰<破碎冰。随着融化过程的进行, 融水矿化度快速下降, 之后逐渐平缓; 其中, 破碎冰初始和结束时融水矿化度和钠吸附比(SAR)均显著低于常规冰; 且初始矿化度为5 g∙L−1时破碎冰的淡水(<1 g∙L−1)融出量高达33.26%, 显著高于同矿化度的其他前处理冰体。可见, 前处理措施可以显著改变咸水冰融化过程中的水盐再分配过程, 这为地下咸水资源利用时通过咸水冰前处理提高盐分淋洗能力提供了理论依据。Abstract: Saline ice irrigation has a positive effect on heavy saline land reclamation and is of great practical importance for alleviating freshwater shortages. Water-salt separation is a salt redistribution process during saline ice melting. We aimed to clarify the influence of pretreatment on the quantity and quality of melted water and the melting duration of saline ice. To achieve these parameters, four ice pretreatments, including aerated ice, stacked ice, crushed ice, and regular ice; and four initial total dissolved solids (TDS) of saline ice of 0, 5, 10, and 15·g·L−1 were used to compare and analyze the dynamics of water quantity and quality during the saline ice melting process. The results showed that aeration, stacking, and crushing treatments significantly reduced the melting duration compared with that of regular ice. The melting duration of each treatment was crushed ice < stacked ice < aerated ice < regular ice. The meltwater volume per unit time showed a trend of rapid increase followed by a gradual decrease, with the peak water volume in the order of regular ice < aerated ice < stacked ice < crushed ice. As the melting process continued, the TDS of the meltwater decreased rapidly and finally stabilized. Among all the pretreatments, the TDS and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of meltwater from crushed ice were significantly lower than those from regular ice. The highest freshwater (<1 g∙L−1) yield was 33.26% at the initial TDS of 5 g∙L−1 for crushed ice. Pretreatment measures can significantly change the water-salt reallocation process of saline ice melting, which provides a theoretical basis for utilization of saline groundwater resources.
-
Key words:
- Saline ice /
- Melting process /
- Total dissolved solids /
- Sodium adsorption ratio
-
图 1 试验装置照片
图中从左到右分别为常规冰、曝气冰、堆积冰、破碎冰。From letf to right are regular ice, aerated ice, stacked ice and crushed ice, respectively.
Figure 1. Photograph of the experimental setup
图 2 不同前处理下不同矿化度咸水冰的融化历时
图中R、A、S、C分别代表常规冰、曝气冰、堆积冰和破碎冰。R, A, S and C represent regular ice, aerated ice, stacked ice and crushed ice separately.
Figure 2. Comparison of melting times of saline ice with different salinities under different pretreatments
图 3 不同初始矿化度下各前处理咸水冰融水水量动态
图中R、A、S、C分别代表常规冰、曝气冰、堆积冰和破碎冰。R, A, S and C represent regular ice, aerated ice, stacked ice and crushed ice, respectively.
Figure 3. Dynamics of the meltwater volumes of saline ice with different salinities under different pretreatments
图 4 不同前处理和矿化度条件下咸水冰融水盐分动态
图中R、A、S、C分别代表常规冰、曝气冰、堆积冰和破碎冰。R, A, S and C represent regular ice, aerated ice, stacked ice and crushed ice, respectively.
Figure 4. Salinity dynamics of meltwater of saline ice with different salinities under different pretreatments
图 5 不同前处理和矿化度条件下咸水冰融水钠吸附比动态
图中R、A、S、C分别代表常规冰、曝气冰、堆积冰和破碎冰。R, A, S and C represent regular ice, aerated ice, stacked ice and crushed ice, respectively.
Figure 5. Dynamics of sodium adsorption ratio of meltwater of saline ice with different salinities under different pretreatments
图 6 不同前处理不同矿化度矿化度咸水的各矿化度融水占比
字母代表前处理方法, R、A、S、C分别指常规冰、曝气冰、堆积冰、破碎冰; 其后数字代表初始矿化度, 如“R5”表示初始矿化度为5 g·L−1的常规冰。The letters in the treatments indicate the pretreatment methods, where R, A, S, and C refer to regular ice, aerated ice, stacked ice, and crushed ice, respctively; the numbers following letters indicate the initial salinity of saline ice, such as R5 means the regular ice pretreatment with an initial salinity of 5 g·L−1.
Figure 6. Salt redistribution of meltwater of saline ice with different salnities under different pretreatments
表 1 试验用不同矿化度咸水的离子组成
Table 1. Ion composition of the saline water of different salinities
% 离子 Ion 5 g∙L−1 10 g∙L−1 15 g∙L−1 K+ 0.029 0.055 0.089 Na+ 1.938 3.952 5.970 Ca2+ 0.030 0.059 0.056 Mg2+ 0.019 0.038 0.048 SO42− 0.146 0.258 0.314 Cl− 3.662 7.649 12.022 HCO3− 0.030 0.039 0.030 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同处理下咸水冰融水矿化度(TDS)和钠吸附比(SAR)始末变化
Table 2. Comparison of total dissolved solids (TDS) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) in meltwater between the starting and ending melting of saline ice with different salinities under different pretreatments
矿化度
Salinity (g∙L−1)前处理
Pre-treatment开始 Start 结束 End TDS SAR TDS SAR 数值 Value (g∙L−1) Std. E 数值 Value Std. E 数值 Value (g∙L−1) Std. E 数值 Value Std. E 5 常规冰 Regular ice 288.61a 23.79 10.65a 1.34 0.20ab 0.17 0.38bc 0.08 曝气冰 Aerated ice 63.58cde 7.06 6.16cde 0.51 0.26ab 0.12 0.51abc 0.11 堆积冰 Stacked ice 71.16cde 24.32 7.34abcd 1.45 0.68a 0.15 0.84a 0.03 破碎冰 Crushed ice 14.54e 5.27 3.4e 1.00 0.06b 0.05 0.16c 0.09 10 常规冰 Regular ice 270.69a 37.65 10.54a 1.94 0.26ab 0.07 0.40abc 0.26 曝气冰 Aerated ice 178.95bc 18.64 10.28ab 1.62 0.02ab 0.04 0.04bc 0.00 堆积冰 Stacked ice 123.49cd 29.17 7.07bcd 2.03 0.77a 0.28 0.69ab 0.40 破碎冰 Crushed ice 31.09de 3.72 4.06de 0.36 0.07b 0.06 0.24bc 0.15 15 常规冰 Regular ice 291.30a 126.57 8.25abc 1.75 0.50ab 0.49 0.33abc 0.29 曝气冰 Aerated ice 287.23a 77.82 7.96abc 2.87 0.42ab 0.25 0.50abc 0.21 堆积冰 Stacked ice 246.10ab 39.57 8.08abc 3.03 0.97a 0.73 0.66abc 0.50 破碎冰 Crushed ice 110.52cd 20.94 6.31cde 1.25 0.11ab 0.03 0.23bc 0.14 Std. E为参数标准误差; 不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异达显著水平(P<0.05)。Std. E is the standard error. Different lowercase letters mean differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同前处理下不同矿化度咸水冰融水矿化度幂函数(
$ y=a \cdot {x}^{b} $ )拟合参数表Table 3. Parameters of the fitted power function (y=a·xb) of total dissolved solids in meltwater (y) of saline ice with different salinities (x) under under different pretreatments
矿化度
Salinity (g∙L−1)前处理
Pre-treatmenta b R2 n 值 Value Std. E Sig. 值 Value Std. E Sig. 5 常规冰 Regular ice 100.90 4.12 <0.01 −1.55 0.06 <0.01 0.98 28 曝气冰 Aerated ice 179.58 9.20 <0.01 −2.53 0.09 <0.01 0.99 23 堆积冰 Stacked ice 70.75 1.11 <0.01 −2.94 0.09 <0.01 0.99 18 破碎冰 Crushed ice 101.04 8.15 <0.01 −2.77 0.10 <0.01 0.99 15 10 常规冰 Regular ice 142.42 9.81 <0.01 −1.10 0.09 <0.01 0.88 28 曝气冰 Aerated ice 184.10 3.69 <0.01 −1.71 0.05 <0.01 0.99 27 堆积冰 Stacked ice 128.56 4.64 <0.01 −1.86 0.10 <0.01 0.98 20 破碎冰 Crushed ice 550.99 109.50 <0.01 −3.08 0.19 <0.01 0.98 16 15 常规冰 Regular ice 167.32 12.14 <0.01 −1.02 0.09 <0.01 0.86 29 曝气冰 Aerated ice 308.80 13.74 <0.01 −1.60 0.09 <0.01 0.95 27 堆积冰 Stacked ice 251.75 6.93 <0.01 −2.08 0.09 <0.01 0.99 20 破碎冰 Crushed ice 9321.27 1836.00 <0.01 −4.86 0.20 <0.01 0.99 17 表中a、b为幂函数中的拟合参数; R2为拟合精度; Std. E为参数标准误差; Sig. 为拟合显著度; n为样本数。a, b are the fitting constants in the power function; R2 is the coefficient of determination; Std. E is the standard error; Sig. is the significance of the fitness; n is the number of data used for fitting.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同前处理下不同矿化度咸水冰融水钠吸附比幂函数(
$y=a \cdot {x}^{b}$ )的拟合参数Table 4. Parameters of of the fitted power function (y=a·xb) of sodium adsorption ratio of meltwater (y) of saline ice with different salinities (x) under different pretreatments
矿化度
Salinity (g∙L−1)前处理
Pre-treatmenta b R2 n 值 Value Std. E Sig. 值 Value Std. E Sig. 5 常规冰 Regular ice 6.89 0.27 <0.01 −0.79 0.04 <0.01 0.93 28 曝气冰 Aerated ice 9.84 0.88 <0.01 −1.06 0.05 <0.01 0.94 23 堆积冰 Stacked ice 6.85 0.26 <0.01 −1.10 0.05 <0.01 0.97 18 破碎冰 Crushed ice 17.18 3.53 <0.01 −1.95 0.14 <0.01 0.96 15 10 常规冰 Regular ice 8.05 0.51 <0.01 −0.73 0.06 <0.01 0.83 28 曝气冰 Aerated ice 14.48 1.13 <0.01 −1.33 0.04 <0.01 0.93 26 堆积冰 Stacked ice 7.51 0.26 <0.01 −0.93 0.04 <0.01 0.97 20 破碎冰 Crushed ice 26.06 4.75 <0.01 −1.95 0.14 <0.01 0.96 16 15 常规冰 Regular ice 7.32 0.61 <0.01 −0.63 0.07 <0.01 0.72 29 曝气冰 Aerated ice 15.27 1.94 <0.01 −1.25 0.07 <0.01 0.85 27 堆积冰 Stacked ice 8.94 0.48 <0.01 −1.0 0.06 <0.01 0.93 20 破碎冰 Crushed ice 51.34 13.32 <0.01 −2.12 0.18 <0.01 0.97 17 表中a、b为幂函数中的拟合参数; R2为拟合精度; Std. E为参数标准误差; Sig.为拟合显著度; n为样本数。a, b are the fitting constants in the power function; R2 is the coefficient of determination; Std. E is the standard error; Sig. is the significance of the fitness; n is the number of data used for fitting.
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 不同前处理下不同矿化度咸水冰单位体积融水矿化度及融出该水量时的咸水冰脱盐率
Table 5. Total dissolved solids (TDS) per unit volume of meltwater and desalination ratio at specific melting stage of saline ice with different salinities under different pretreatments
矿化度
TDS (g∙L−1)前处理
Pre-treatment融水矿化度
TDS of melted water (g∙L−1)咸水冰融化各阶段脱盐率
Desalination ratio at each melting stage (%)0%~25% 25%~50% 50%~75% 75%~100% 25% 50% 75% 5 常规冰 Regular ice 14.38±0.78f 2.65±0.31e 2.16±0.26bc 0.8±0.23cd 71.92±3.91cde 85.16±2.44cd 95.99±1.3bc 曝气冰 Aerated ice 14.38±0.60f 2.97±0.58e 2.04±0.24bc 0.61±0.16cd 71.88±3cde 86.74±1.32cd 96.93±1.18b 堆积冰 Stacked ice 13.51±0.66f 3.27±0.43e 1.96±0.25bc 1.26±0.04c 67.57±3.3de 83.94±1.14d 93.72±1.26d 破碎冰 Crushed ice 12.84±0.77f 5.02±0.51d 1.78±0.26c 0.36±0.07d 64.21±3.83e 89.3±1.63bc 98.2±1.31a 10 常规冰 Regular ice 31.72±0.79d 5.71±0.55d 2.07±0.25bc 0.5±0.16d 79.3±1.97abc 93.57±0.98ab 98.75±0.64a 曝气冰 Aerated ice 31.63±0.22d 5.39±0.09d 2.46±0.29bc 0.52±0.05d 79.08±0.54abc 92.54±0.61ab 98.69±0.72a 堆积冰 Stacked ice 27.92±0.35e 5.92±0.22d 3.98±0.34b 2.17±0.52b 69.81±0.87de 84.61±0.44d 94.57±0.86cd 破碎冰 Crushed ice 25.52±1.85e 11.58±1.33b 2.42±0.45bc 0.47±0.11d 63.81±4.63e 92.76±1.39ab 98.81±1.12a 15 常规冰 Regular ice 50.62±2.58a 6.45±1.87cd 2.16±0.9bc 0.76±0.16cd 84.37±4.3a 95.12±1.57a 98.73±1.5a 曝气冰 Aerated ice 48.40±2.36a 8.26±1.92c 2.56±0.49bc 0.78±0.17cd 80.67±3.94ab 94.44±1.1a 98.7±0.82a 堆积冰 Stacked ice 43.93±3.34b 7.98±1.04c 5.44±1.87a 2.66±0.47a 73.21±5.57bcd 86.5±3.87cd 95.57±3.12bcd 破碎冰 Crushed ice 40.29±1.07c 15.24±0.82a 3.58±1.24bc 0.89±0.47cd 67.16±1.79de 92.56±2.69ab 98.52±2.06a 不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异达显著水平(P<0.05)。Different lowercase letters mean significant difference among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] QADIR M, GHAFOOR A, MURTAZA G. Amelioration strategies for saline soils: a review[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2000, 11(6): 501−521 [2] ZHANG Y, YANG J S, HUANG Y H, et al. Use of freeze-thaw purified saline water to leach and reclaim gypsum-amended saline-alkali soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2019, 83(5): 1333−1342 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2019.03.0081 [3] OSTER J D. Irrigation with poor quality water[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1994, 25(3): 271−297 doi: 10.1016/0378-3774(94)90064-7 [4] 王全九, 徐益敏, 王金栋, 等. 咸水与微咸水在农业灌溉中的应用[J]. 灌溉排水, 2002, 21(4): 73−77WANG Q J, XU Y M, WANG J D, et al. Application of saline and slight saline water for farmland irrigation[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2002, 21(4): 73−77 [5] 王艳娜, 侯振安, 龚江, 等. 咸水资源农业灌溉应用研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(2): 393−397 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.02.093WANG Y N, HOU Z A, GONG J, et al. Development and expectation of utilization of saline water resources in agriculture irrigation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(2): 393−397 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.02.093 [6] 郑智颖, 李凤臣, 李倩, 等. 海水淡化技术应用研究及发展现状[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(21): 2344−2370 doi: 10.1360/N972015-00829ZHENG Z Y, LI F C, LI Q, et al. State-of-the-art of R & D on seawater desalination technology[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(21): 2344−2370 doi: 10.1360/N972015-00829 [7] GUO K, LIU X J. Dynamics of meltwater quality and quantity during saline ice melting and its effects on the infiltration and desalinization of coastal saline soils[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 139: 1−6 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.007 [8] GUO K, LIU X J. Salt leaching process in coastal saline soil by infiltration of melting saline ice under field conditions[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 75(4): 549−562 doi: 10.2489/jswc.2020.00161 [9] GUO K, LIU X J. Effect of initial soil water content and bulk density on the infiltration and desalination of melting saline ice water in coastal saline soil[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 70(6): 1249−1266 [10] COTTIER F, EICKEN H, WADHAMS P. Linkages between salinity and brine channel distribution in young sea ice[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1999, 104(C7): 15859−15871 doi: 10.1029/1999JC900128 [11] GU W, LIN Y B, XU Y J, et al. Gravity-induced sea ice desalination under low temperature[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2013, 86: 133−141 doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.10.004 [12] ZHANG Y, YANG J S, YAO R J. An investigation of the factors affecting saline ice melting processes and desalination[J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2018, 46(8): 1700628 doi: 10.1002/clen.201700628 [13] LUO C S, CHEN W W, HAN W F. Experimental study on factors affecting the quality of ice crystal during the freezing concentration for the brackish water[J]. Desalination, 2010, 260(1): 231−238 [14] HAN S, SHIN J Y, RHEE Y W, et al. Enhanced efficiency of salt removal from brine for cyclopentane hydrates by washing, centrifuging, and sweating[J]. Desalination, 2014, 354: 17−22 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.023 [15] 郭凯, 刘小京. 咸水结冰融化过程中水质与水量的变化规律初步研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2013, 32(1): 56−60GUO K, LIU X J. The primary research on the variation of melted water quality and quantity during saline ice melting[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2013, 32(1): 56−60 [16] 王瑞琪, 栗现文, 郑哪, 等. 微咸水冰体融出水质及基于HYDRUS-1D的土壤淋洗特征研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(2): 378−389WANG R Q, LI X W, ZHENG N, et al. Dewaterability of frozen-melt brackish water and its soil salt leaching efficiency based on HYDRUS-1D[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 10.11766/trxb202105250272 [17] 许映军, 顾卫, 陈伟斌, 等. 重力法海冰固态自脱盐的姿态效应[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2007, 26(1): 28−32 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2007.01.007XU Y J, GU W, CHEN W B, et al. Influence of posture of desalination of sea ice in solid state by gravitation[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2007, 26(1): 28−32 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2007.01.007 [18] GU W, LIN Y B, XU Y J, et al. Sea ice desalination under the force of gravity in low temperature environments[J]. Desalination, 2012, 295: 11−15 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.03.017 [19] 吴忠东, 王全九. 微咸水钠吸附比对土壤理化性质和入渗特性的影响研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008, 26(1): 231−236WU Z D, WANG Q J. Study on impact of sodium adsorption ratio of saline water on soil physical and chemical properties and infiltration characteristics[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008, 26(1): 231−236 [20] UNTERSTEINER N. The Geophysics of Sea Ice[M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1986 [21] UNTERSTEINER N. On the mass and heat budget of arctic sea ice[J]. Archiv Für Meteorologie, Geophysik Und Bioklimatologie, Serie A, 1961, 12(2): 151−182 [22] HANDA Y P, ZAKRZEWSKI M, FAIRBRIDGE C. Effect of restricted geometries on the structure and thermodynamic properties of ice[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1992, 96(21): 8594−8599 doi: 10.1021/j100200a070 [23] 胡越, 邵光成, 蒋傲, 等. 滴灌流量对不同质地土壤水盐运移的影响研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021(8): 133−139 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2021.08.023HU Y, SHAO G C, JIANG A, et al. Research on the effect of drip irrigation flow on moisture and salt transport in different texture soils[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021(8): 133−139 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2021.08.023 [24] 谭军利, 马永鑫, 王西娜, 等. 微咸水灌溉下滴头流量及灌水量对压砂土壤入渗及水盐分布的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(3): 113−120 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2022.03.14TAN J L, MA Y X, WANG X N, et al. Effects of emitter discharge rate and water amount under brackish drip irrigation on water infiltration and distribution of soil moisture and salts with gravel-sand mulching[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2022, 40(3): 113−120 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2022.03.14 [25] 邹小阳, 刘涛, 杨以翠, 等. 滴灌条件下土壤水盐运移特征及影响因素研究综述[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(22): 192−195 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.22.120ZOU X Y, LIU T, YANG Y C, et al. Review on characteristics of water and salt transport in soil under drip irrigation and its influencing factors[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018(22): 192−195 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.22.120 [26] BLUTEAU C E, PIETERS R, LAWRENCE G A. The effects of salt exclusion during ice formation on circulation in lakes[J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 17(3): 579−590 doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9508-6 [27] BRIMBLECOMBE P, CLEGG S L, DAVIES T D, et al. The loss of halide and sulphate ions from melting ice[J]. Water Research, 1988, 22(6): 693−700 doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(88)90180-7 [28] BRIMBLECOMBE P, CLEGG S L, DAVIES T D, et al. Observations of the preferential loss of major ions from melting snow and laboratory ice[J]. Water Research, 1987, 21(10): 1279−1286 doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(87)90181-3 [29] MEDJANI K. Numerical simulation of the formation of brine pockets during the freezing of the NaCl-H2O compound from above[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1996, 23(7): 917−928 doi: 10.1016/0735-1933(96)00074-7 [30] 徐学仁, 陈伟斌, 刘现明, 等. 海冰淡化方法研究: 浸泡脱盐法[J]. 资源科学, 2003, 25(3): 33−36 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2003.03.005XU X R, CHEN W B, LIU X M, et al. Method of desalting sea ice: soaking to desalt[J]. Resources Science, 2003, 25(3): 33−36 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2003.03.005 [31] COLE D M, SHAPIRO L H. Observations of brine drainage networks and microstructure of first-year sea ice[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1998, 103(C10): 21739−21750 doi: 10.1029/98JC01264 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 71
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
