Optimal nitrogen application rate for winter wheat under multi-objective constraints in the North China Plain
-
摘要: 农田氮素管理不当导致水体污染、土壤结构破坏和全球变暖等环境问题。从经济与生态环境各方面探讨华北平原冬小麦的最优施氮量可为粮食生产及区域农业生态保护提供重要的科学参考。本文利用华北平原9个站点1981—2017年的逐日气象数据及冬小麦物候和产量观测资料, 借助CERES-Wheat模型, 基于5个约束指标(产量、氮肥偏生产力、氮素吸收、增产-节氮权衡和环境-经济效益)和施氮量的关系曲线, 揭示华北平原冬小麦在不同约束条件下的最优施氮量。结果表明: 华北平原各站点基于不同目标约束所得的最优施氮量有所不同, 其大小顺序为氮素吸收>产量>环境-经济效益>增产-节氮权衡>氮肥偏生产力, 且各地区最优施氮量的参考值也存在一定的空间差异。通过对粮食安全与生态友好的综合考量, 本研究认为增产-节氮权衡和环境-经济效益约束条件下的最优施氮量能够实现经济效益和生态效益的统一, 是较合理的区域施氮参考, 该条件下最优施氮量分别为173 kg∙hm−2和190 kg∙hm−2, 比当前华北平原农民实际施氮水平分别减少约47%和42%, 可以作为冬小麦种植施氮的区域参考值。该目标约束下最优施氮量的低值主要分布在Ⅱ区和Ⅳ区, 分别为150 kg∙hm−2和170 kg∙hm−2, Ⅰ区和Ⅲ区则相对较高, 最优施氮量分别为200 kg∙hm−2和225 kg∙hm−2, 原因可能在于长期施氮降低土壤有机碳含量, 进而影响土壤供氮能力。Abstract: The oversupply of nitrogen fertilizers has caused serious environmental problems, such as water pollution, destruction of soil structure, and global warming. Thus, the optimal nitrogen application rate of winter wheat should consider the environmental impacts. Many attempts have been made to evaluate the optimal winter wheat nitrogen application rate using different indicators, such as yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen uptake. However, previous studies have only focused on economic benefits and did not consider the ecological benefits. Furthermore, the optimal nitrogen application rates have been evaluated with individual indicators; a systematic approach that integrates these indicators has not yet been presented. To better understand the optimal nitrogen application rate for winter wheat under multi-objective constraints in the North China Plain, this study used the daily meteorological data, observation data of the phenology, and the yield of winter wheat at nine stations (Tangshan, Huanghua, Luancheng, Huimin, Nangong, Ganyu, Shangqiu, Zhumadian, and Shouxian) from 1981 to 2017, to simulate five indicators of the economic and environmental benefits of the winter wheat (yield, nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen uptake, the balance between yield increase and nitrogen saving, and environmental-economic benefits) by using the crop estimation through resource and environment synthesis (CERES)-Wheat model. The relationship between each indicator and the nitrogen application rate was investigated to determine the optimal nitrogen application rates under different constraints. Finally, the comprehensive optimal nitrogen application rate was determined according to the economic and ecological benefits. The results indicated that the optimal nitrogen application rates varied across stations and objective constraints. The average value of the optimal nitrogen application rate for the nine stations from high to low were that constrained by nitrogen uptake (363 kg∙hm−2), yield (257 kg∙hm−2), environment-economic benefits (190 kg∙hm−2), the balance between yield increase and nitrogen saving (173 kg∙hm−2) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (30 kg∙hm−2). The optimal nitrogen application rates under the constraints of the balance between yield increase and nitrogen-saving and environmental-economic benefits were 173 kg∙hm−2 and 190 kg∙hm−2, respectively. This indicates a reduction by approximately 20%−30% of the nitrogen application rates for constraints related to yield maximization, and reductions by 47% and 42% compared to the actual nitrogen application rates of farmers in the North China Plain. Thus, the environmental damage caused by nitrogen fertilizers can be minimized under these constraints. Meanwhile, approximately 90% of the wheat yield can be obtained with these optimal nitrogen application rates, and economic and ecological benefits can be simultaneously guaranteed. To secure grain production and minimize environmental impacts, the optimal nitrogen application rates under the constraints of the balance between yield increase and nitrogen-saving and environmental-economic benefits can be regarded as the regional reference for winter wheat planting in the North China Plain. The regional reference of the optimal nitrogen application rates for winter wheat varied with zones, it was 150 kg∙hm−2 in the piedmont plains of Taihang Mountain and Yanshan Mountain, and 170 kg∙hm−2 in the Nanyang Basin. For the winter wheat in the Shandong Peninsula and the plains around Bohai Sea, the optimal nitrogen application rate was higher (200 kg∙hm−2), and in the Haihe Plain, the optimal nitrogen application rate was 225 kg∙hm−2.
-
图 7 华北平原各指标约束下冬小麦最优施氮量
Yield: 产量; PFPN: 氮肥偏生产力; NUP: 氮素吸收; Y-N: 增产-节氮权衡; EV-EC: 环境-经济效益; Act: 农户实际施氮量。PFPN: nitrogen partial factor productivity; NUP: N uptake; Y-N: the balance of yield increase and nitrogen-saving; EV-EC: environmental-economic benefits; Act: actual nitrogen application of farmers.
Figure 7. Optimal N application rates under different constraints of winter wheat in the NCP
图 8 华北平原冬小麦最优施氮量下各约束指标的基本情况
Yield: 产量; PFPN: 氮肥偏生产力; NUP: 氮素吸收; Y-N: 增产-节氮权衡; EV-EC: 环境-经济效益; Act: 农户实际施氮量。每个指标后括号内数据为最优施氮量。PFPN: nitrogen partial factor productivity; NUP: N uptake; Y-N: the balance of yield increase and nitrogen-saving; EV-EC: environmental-economic benefits; Act: actual nitrogen application of farmers. The date in the bracket following the indicator is the optimal N application rate.
Figure 8. Conditions of each constraint indicator under the optimal N application rate of winter wheat in the NCP
图 9 华北平原各站点冬小麦最优施氮量分布图
Yield: 产量; PFPN: 氮肥偏生产力; NUP: 氮素吸收; Y-N: 增产-节氮权衡; EV-EC: 环境-经济效益; Act: 农户实际施氮量。PFPN: nitrogen partial factor productivity; NUP: N uptake; Y-N: the balance of yield increase and nitrogen-saving; EV-EC: environmental-economic benefits; Act: actual nitrogen application of farmers.
Figure 9. Optimal N application rates of winter wheat in the NCP stations
-
[1] PISHGAR-KOMLEH S H, AKRAM A, KEYHANI A, et al. Integration of life cycle assessment, artificial neural networks, and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for optimization of tomato-based cropping systems in Iran[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25(3): 620−632 doi: 10.1007/s11367-019-01707-6 [2] MALHI S S, GRANT C A, JOHNSTON A M, et al. Nitrogen fertilization management for no-till cereal production in the Canadian Great Plains: a review[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2001, 60(3/4): 101−122 [3] LI S X, WANG Z H, HU T T, et al. Chapter 3 nitrogen in dryland soils of China and its management[M]//Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009: 123–181 [4] 柏慧, 张秀, 初金鹏, 等. 氮肥水平对强筋小麦产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(4): 7−14 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090100BAI H, ZHANG X, CHU J P, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer level: Effects on yield and nitrogen utilization of strong gluten wheat[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(4): 7−14 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090100 [5] ZHANG H, TAO F L, ZHOU G S. Potential yields, yield gaps, and optimal agronomic management practices for rice production systems in different regions of China[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2019, 171: 100−112 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.01.007 [6] ZHAO Z G, QIN X, WANG E L, et al. Modelling to increase the eco-efficiency of a wheat-maize double cropping system[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 210: 36−46 [7] 康飞, 孟凡乔. 基于文献分析的北方冬麦田氨挥发特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(1): 228−234 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.01.027KANG F, MENG F Q. Ammonia volatilization from winter wheat cropland in Northern China based on a literature analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(1): 228−234 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.01.027 [8] TIAN Z, WANG J J, LIU S, et al. Application effects of coated urea and urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical cotton field of the Mississippi delta region[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 533: 329−338 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.147 [9] WU Y Y, GU B J, ERISMAN J W, et al. PM2.5 pollution is substantially affected by ammonia emissions in China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 218: 86−94 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.027 [10] 马登科, 殷俐娜, 刘溢健, 等. 施氮量对黄土高原旱地冬小麦产量和水分利用效率影响的整合分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(3): 486−499 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.003MA D K, YIN L N, LIU Y J, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen application rates on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in dryland of Loess Plateau[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 486−499 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.003 [11] 刘建刚, 褚庆全, 王光耀, 等. 基于DSSAT模型的氮肥管理下华北地区冬小麦产量差的模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(23): 124−129 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.23.017LIU J G, CHU Q Q, WANG G Y, et al. Simulating yield gap of winter wheat in response to nitrogen management in North China Plain based on DSSAT model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(23): 124−129 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.23.017 [12] 钟茜, 巨晓棠, 张福锁. 华北平原冬小麦/夏玉米轮作体系对氮素环境承受力分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(3): 285−293 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2006.03.001ZHONG Q, JU X T, ZHANG F S. Analysis of environmental endurance of winter wheat/summer maize rotation system to nitrogen in North China Plain[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006, 12(3): 285−293 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2006.03.001 [13] KHOSHNEVISAN B, RAFIEE S, PAN J T, et al. A multi-criteria evolutionary-based algorithm as a regional scale decision support system to optimize nitrogen consumption rate: A case study in North China Plain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 256: 120213 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120213 [14] 吴强, 张永平, 董玉新, 等. 施氮量和灌水模式对小麦产量、品质和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(3): 334−342 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2020.03.10WU Q, ZHANG Y P, DONG Y X, et al. Effect of nitrogen application rates and irrigation modes on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and quality in wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40(3): 334−342 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2020.03.10 [15] 沙之敏, 边秀举, 郑伟, 等. 最佳养分管理对华北冬小麦养分吸收和利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(5): 1049−1055 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2010.0502SHA Z M, BIAN X J, ZHENG W, et al. Effects of optimum nutrient management on nutrient uptake and utilization of winter wheat in North China Plain[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(5): 1049−1055 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2010.0502 [16] BAI H Z, TAO F L. Sustainable intensification options to improve yield potential and eco-efficiency for rice-wheat rotation system in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 211: 89−105 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.010 [17] 陈天鑫, 王艳杰, 张燕, 等. 不同施氮量对冬小麦光合生理指标及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (2): 88−96CHEN T X, WANG Y J, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of different nitrogen rates on photosynthetic and physiological indexes and yield of winter wheat[J]. Crops, 2020, (2): 88−96 [18] XIN Y, TAO F L. Optimizing genotype-environment-management interactions to enhance productivity and eco-efficiency for wheat-maize rotation in the North China Plain[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 654: 480−492 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.126 [19] 刘建超, 何建强, 武文杰, 等. 水氮管理影响冬小麦品质的CERES-Wheat模型模拟[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(7): 271−278 doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.07.032LIU J C, HE J Q, WU W J, et al. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer managements on winter wheat quality based on CERES-Wheat model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(7): 271−278 doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.07.032 [20] 成林, 李彤霄, 刘荣花. 主要生育期气候变化对河南省冬小麦生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(6): 931−940CHENG L, LI T X, LIU R H. Effect of climate change on growth and yield of winter wheat in Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(6): 931−940 [21] CUI Z L, ZHANG F S, CHEN X P, et al. On-farm evaluation of an in-season nitrogen management strategy based on soil Nmin test[J]. Field Crops Research, 2008, 105(1/2): 48−55 [22] 任思洋, 张青松, 李婷玉, 等. 华北平原五省冬小麦产量和氮素管理的时空变异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24): 4527−4539 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.24.008REN S Y, ZHANG Q S, LI T Y, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of winter wheat yield and nitrogen management in five provinces of North China Plain[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4527−4539 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.24.008 [23] ZHANG Y T, WANG H Y, LEI Q L, et al. Optimizing the nitrogen application rate for maize and wheat based on yield and environment on the Northern China Plain[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 618: 1173−1183 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.183 [24] 熊伟. CERES-Wheat模型在我国小麦区的应用效果及误差来源[J]. 应用气象学报, 2009, 20(1): 88−94 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2009.01.011XIONG W. The performance of CERES-Wheat model in wheat planting areas and its uncertainties[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2009, 20(1): 88−94 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2009.01.011 [25] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915−924 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, et al. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 915−924 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018 [26] XIA L L, TI C P, LI B L, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases during the life-cycles of staple food production in China and their mitigation potential[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 556: 116−125 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.204 [27] CHEN X P, CUI Z L, FAN M S, et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs[J]. Nature, 2014, 514(7523): 486−489 doi: 10.1038/nature13609 [28] YAN X Y, AKIMOTO H, OHARA T. Estimation of nitrous oxide, nitric oxide and ammonia emissions from croplands in East, Southeast and South Asia[J]. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(7): 1080−1096 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00649.x [29] 刘巽浩, 陈阜. 中国农作制[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005LIU X H, CHEN F. Farming Systems in China[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005 [30] QIN W L, ZHANG X Y, CHEN S Y, et al. Crop rotation and N application rate affecting the performance of winter wheat under deficit irrigation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 210: 330−339 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.026 [31] 刘梦, 梁茜, 葛均筑, 等. 不同密度下施氮量对夏玉米产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(6): 153−159 doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190333LIU M, LIANG Q, GE J Z, et al. Effects of nitrogen and density on summer maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(6): 153−159 doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190333 [32] 李春喜, 刘晴, 邵云, 等. 有机物料还田和减施氮肥对小麦氮素利用及经济效益的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(6): 214−220 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2019.06.31LI C X, LIU Q, SHAO Y, et al. Effects of organic materials returning and nitrogen fertilizer reduction on nitrogen utilization and economic benefits of wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(6): 214−220 doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2019.06.31 [33] 李珺, 刘双全, 仇少君, 等. 不同施氮量对典型黑土马铃薯产量、养分吸收和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(4): 1−8LI J, LIU S Q, QIU S J, et al. Effects of different nitrogen rates on potato yield and nitrogen use efficiency in a typical black soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2020, 26(4): 1−8 [34] 刘恩科, 梅旭荣, 龚道枝, 等. 不同生育时期干旱对冬小麦氮素吸收与利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5): 555−562 doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009LIU E K, MEI X R, GONG D Z, et al. Effects of drought on N absorption and utilization in winter wheat at different developmental stages[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(5): 555−562 doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009 [35] LIU Z, YU N N, CAMBERATO J J, et al. Crop production kept stable and sustainable with the decrease of nitrogen rate in North China Plain: an economic and environmental assessment over 8 years[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 19335 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55913-1