Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SONG Y N, CHEN Z J, LIN Y, HU T J, WU M J, WANG F. Effect of insect-resistant transgenic rice and its hybrid combination rice on diversity and composition of soil microbial community[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(1): 15−29 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230267
Citation: SONG Y N, CHEN Z J, LIN Y, HU T J, WU M J, WANG F. Effect of insect-resistant transgenic rice and its hybrid combination rice on diversity and composition of soil microbial community[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(1): 15−29 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230267

Effect of insect-resistant transgenic rice and its hybrid combination rice on diversity and composition of soil microbial community

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230267
Funds:  This study was supported by Fujian Provincial Public Welfare Research Institute Special Project (2021R1027002), The ‘5511’ Collaborative Innovation Project for High-quality Development and Surpasses of Agriculture between Government of Fujian Province and Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (XTCXGC2021002), and Fujian Province Science and Technology Major Project (2020NZ08017).
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: wf@fjage.org
  • Received Date: 2023-05-15
  • Accepted Date: 2023-08-21
  • Available Online: 2023-10-16
  • Microorganisms drive the soil material cycle and evolution of fertility, and their community composition is related to the stability and sustainability of the soil microecosystem. The study of changes in the soil microbial community in insect-resistant transgenic rice is an important part of environmental safety assessments. Based on high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS genes, this study analyzed the differences in diversity and composition of microbial communities in paddy soils with insect-resistant transgenic rice ‘MFB’, insect-resistant transgenic hybrid rice ‘Minfeng A/MFB’ ‘Tianfeng A/MFB’ or ‘Gufeng A/MFB’ and non-transgenic conventional rice ‘Minhui 3301’ or hybrid rice ‘Tianyouhuazhan’. The results showed that, compared with non-transgenic conventional rice ‘Minhui 3301’ or hybrid rice ‘Tianyouhuazhan’, both insect-resistant transgenic rice ‘MFB’ and transgenic hybrid rice ‘Minfeng A/MFB’ ‘Tianfeng A/MFB’ or ‘Gufeng A/MFB’ could significantly increase the yield (P<0.05). At the same time, high-throughput sequencing showed that the α-diversity indexes of Chao1, Observed_species, and Shannon of bacterial or fungal communities in paddy soil with ‘MFB’ were higher than those in soil with ‘Minhui 3301’ at all stage except for fungal communities at rice maturation stage, and the differences at rice maturation or tillering stage are significant (P<0.05). At the heading stage of rice, the values of α-diversity indexes of Shannon of bacterial or fungal communities in paddy soils with the insect-resistant transgenic hybrid rice ‘Minfeng A/MFB’ ‘Tianfeng A/MFB’ or ‘Gufeng A/MFB’ were between those of soils with ‘MFB’ and ‘Tianyouhuazhan’. The results of β-diversity analysis of bacterial or fungal communities showed that there were no significant differences in the composition of microbial communities in paddy soils with different varieties of rice in this field experiment. However, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, which showed the highest abundance of bacteria, in paddy soil with ‘MFB’ increased compared with that of ‘Minhui 3301’, and reached the significance level at the tillering and maturation stage of rice (P<0.05). In contrast, the relative abundance of Ascomycota, which showed the highest abundance of fungi, was reduced in paddy soil with ‘MFB’ and reached the significance level at the tillering and heading stages of rice (P<0.05). At the heading stage of rice, the relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Ascomycota in paddy soils with ‘Minfeng A/MFB’ ‘Tianfeng A/MFB’ or ‘Gufeng A/MFB’ were between those of soils with ‘MFB’ and ‘Tianyouhuazhan’. According to the functional prediction of microbial communities, the differences in functional composition of bacterial communities in paddy soil between soils with ‘MFB’ and ‘Minhui 3301’ gradually increased with rice growth. In summary, insect-resistant transgenic rice and its transgenic hybrid rice increased the diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities and changed the relative abundance of major bacterial and fungal species with increased yield, but did not have significant effects on the community and functional composition of bacteria or fungi.
  • loading
  • [1]
    国际农业生物技术应用服务组织. 2019年全球生物技术/转基因作物商业化发展态势[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(1): 114−119

    International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Global commercialization of biotechnology/transgenic crops in 2019[J]. China Biotechnology, 2021, 41(1): 114−119
    [2]
    BAUDOIN E, BENIZRI E, GUCKERT A. Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35(9): 1183−1192 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00179-2
    [3]
    AIRA M, GÓMEZ-BRANDÓN M, LAZCANO C, et al. Plant genotype strongly modifies the structure and growth of maize rhizosphere microbial communities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(12): 2276−2281 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.029
    [4]
    BERG G, SMALLA K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2009, 68(1): 1−13 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x
    [5]
    INCEOĞLU O, SALLES J F, VAN OVERBEEK L, et al. Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the betaproteobacterial communities associated with different potato cultivars in two fields[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(11): 3675−3684 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00040-10
    [6]
    LU G H, ZHU Y L, KONG L R, et al. Impact of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line on the rhizobacteria, revealed by illumina MiSeq[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 27(3): 561−572 doi: 10.4014/jmb.1609.09008
    [7]
    杨永华. 转基因作物对土壤微生物群落的影响及主要研究策略[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2011, 19(1): 1−8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2011.01.001

    YANG Y H. Advances on the effects of genetically modified crops on soil microbial community and main countermeasures of their approaches[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2011, 19(1): 1−8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2011.01.001
    [8]
    JAMES C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011[M]. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA, 2011
    [9]
    DONEGAN K K, PALM C J, FIELAND V J, et al. Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 1995, 2(2): 111−124 doi: 10.1016/0929-1393(94)00043-7
    [10]
    CASTALDINI M, TURRINI A, SBRANA C, et al. Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(11): 6719−6729 doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6719-6729.2005
    [11]
    WU W X, YE Q F, MIN H, et al. Bt-transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(2): 289−295 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.014
    [12]
    LU H H, WU W X, CHEN Y X, et al. Decomposition of Bt transgenic rice residues and response of soil microbial community in rapeseed-rice cropping system[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 336(1): 279−290
    [13]
    SONG Y N, SU J, CHEN R, et al. Diversity of microbial community in a paddy soil with cry1Ac/cpti transgenic rice[J]. Pedosphere, 2014, 24(3): 349−358 doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60021-7
    [14]
    楼骏, 柳勇, 李延. 高通量测序技术在土壤微生物多样性研究中的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(15): 256−260 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2513

    LOU J, LIU Y, LI Y. Review of high-throughput sequencing techniques in studies of soil microbial diversity[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(15): 256−260 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2513
    [15]
    郑燕, 贾仲君. 新一代高通量测序与稳定性同位素示踪DNA/RNA技术研究稻田红壤甲烷氧化的微生物过程[J]. 微生物学报, 2013, 53(2): 173−184

    ZHENG Y, JIA Z J. Next generation sequencing and stable isotope probing of active microorganisms responsible for aerobic methane oxidation in red paddy soils[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2013, 53(2): 173−184
    [16]
    陈庆荣, 王成己, 陈曦, 等. 施用烟秆生物黑炭对红壤性稻田根际土壤微生物的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(2): 184−188

    CHEN Q R, WANG C J, CHEN X, et al. Effect of tobacco stalk-derived biochar on microbes in rhizosphere soil at red paddy fields[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(2): 184−188
    [17]
    张芳, 林绍艳, 徐颖洁. 水稻连作对江苏地区稻田土细菌微生物多样性的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(2): 161−165

    ZHANG F, LIN S Y, XU Y J. The effect of continuous cropping rice on diversity of soil bacteria microbial in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 45(2): 161−165
    [18]
    SONG Y N, SU J, WU M J, et al. Effect of Hvsusiba2 transgenic rice on soil bacterial community and functional gene in paddy field in Fujian Province China[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 2021, 9(5): 112−120
    [19]
    CAPORASO J G, BITTINGER K, BUSHMAN F D, et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment[J]. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(2): 266−267 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636
    [20]
    LOZUPONE C, KNIGHT R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(12): 8228−8235 doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005
    [21]
    单贞. 异源表达Hvsusiba2籼稻“明恢86”稻田甲烷减排研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017

    SHAN Z. Study on mitigating methane in paddy fields of Indica rice “Minghui86” with heterologous expression of Hvsusiba2[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2017
    [22]
    FLORES S, SAXENA D, STOTZKY G. Transgenic Bt plants decompose less in soil than non-Bt plants[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37(6): 1073−1082 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.006
    [23]
    POERSCHMANN J, GATHMANN A, AUGUSTIN J, et al. Molecular composition of leaves and stems of genetically modified Bt and near-isogenic non-Bt maize — Characterization of lignin patterns[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2005, 34(5): 1508−1518 doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0070
    [24]
    POERSCHMANN J, RAUSCHEN S, LANGER U, et al. Molecular level lignin patterns of genetically modified Bt-maize MON88017 and three conventional varieties using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH)-induced thermochemolysis[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(24): 11906−11913 doi: 10.1021/jf8023694
    [25]
    POERSCHMANN J, RAUSCHEN S, LANGER U, et al. Fatty acid patterns of genetically modified Cry3Bb1 expressing Bt-maize MON88017 and its near-isogenic line[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57(1): 127−132 doi: 10.1021/jf803009u
    [26]
    曾千春, 周开达, 朱祯, 等. 中国水稻杂种优势利用现状[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2000, 14(4): 243−246 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2000.04.012

    ZENG Q C, ZHOU K D, ZHU Z, et al. Current status in the use of hybrid rice heterosis in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2000, 14(4): 243−246 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2000.04.012
    [27]
    BERENDSEN R L, PIETERSE C M J, BAKKER P A H M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17(8): 478−486 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001
    [28]
    BULGARELLI D, SCHLAEPPI K, SPAEPEN S, et al. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2013, 64: 807−838 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106
    [29]
    MASOERO F, MOSCHINI M, ROSSI F, et al. Nutritive value-mycotoxin contamination and in vitro rumen fermentation of normal and genetically modified corn (cry1A(b)) grown in Northern Italy[J]. Maydica, 1999, 44: 205−209
    [30]
    SONG Y N, CHEN Z J, WU M J, et al. Changes in bacterial community and abundance of functional genes in paddy soil with cry1Ab transgenic rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(6): 1674−1686 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63271-3
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (112) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return