Biodiversity maintenance and warning technology in rural ecological landscapes

XIE Zongqiang; ZHANG Yujun; WANG Yiqiang; GE Jielin; XU Wenting; XIONG Gaoming; XU Kai; MAO Jiangtao; CHEN Siqi; FENG Zhi

doi:10.12357/cjea.20230408

Volume 31 Issue 12

Dec. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture > 2023 > 31(12): 1873-1882

XIE Z Q, ZHANG Y J, WANG Y Q, GE J L, XU W T, XIONG G M, XU K, MAO J T, CHEN S Q, FENG Z. Biodiversity maintenance and warning technology in rural ecological landscapes[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(12): 1873−1882 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230408

Citation:

PDF( 5373 KB)

Biodiversity maintenance and warning technology in rural ecological landscapes

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230408

1.
State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
2.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
3.
School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
4.
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Forestry Biotechnology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China

Funds: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2019YFD1100403).

Received Date: 2023-07-23
Accepted Date: 2023-09-06

Available Online: 2023-10-21

Publish Date: 2023-12-15

Abstract

Abstract

Biodiversity in rural landscapes plays a critical role in the vitalization and sustainable development of rural regions. We explored a set of methods for identifying biodiversity at different scales and uncovered the mechanisms that drive biodiversity in rural landscapes. We also formulated technical specifications for the maintenance of biodiversity from genes to ecosystems in rural landscapes. In addition, we developed a framework for biodiversity monitoring and warning systems in rural landscapes based on the Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) conceptual mode. We developed a multiscale full-chain technology for biodiversity identification, maintenance, and warning in rural ecological landscapes. This study yielded powerful insights into the biodiversity maintenance mechanism in rural landscapes by integrating multidisciplinary research methods, such as literature research, field survey, and laboratory analysis, and filled the gap in biodiversity maintenance technology in rural ecological landscape construction. Our study plays a theoretical and practical foundation for the development of rural ecological construction models, planting design and configuration, and species selection for the construction of beautiful villages in China. Furthermore, this multiscale and full-chain technology developed for biodiversity identification, maintenance, and warning in rural ecological landscapes provides key technical support for the dynamic management of rural ecological resources and plays a fundamental role in rural revitalization and the construction of a beautiful China.
- Ecological-production-living space,
- Village scale,
- Germplasm resources,
- Ecosystem classification,
- Monitoring and warning,
- Landscape construction

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	WU Y N, WANG H J, WANG Z X, et al. Knowledge mapping analysis of rural landscape using CiteSpace[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 12(1): 66 doi: 10.3390/su12010066
[2]	NAVEH Z, LIEBERMAN A S. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application[M]. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 1993
[3]	YANG S T, LI C J, LOU H Z, et al. Role of the countryside landscapes for sustaining biodiversity in karst areas at a semi centennial scale[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 123: 107315 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107315
[4]	LI L, HU R C, HUANG J K, et al. A farmland biodiversity strategy is needed for China[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4(6): 772−774
[5]	TORRI M C, HERRMANN T M. Biodiversity conservation versus rural development: what kind of possible harmonization? The case study of Alwar District, Rajasthan, India[J]. Journal of Human Ecology, 2010, 31(2): 93−101 doi: 10.1080/09709274.2010.11906308
[6]	ERIKSSON O. The importance of traditional agricultural landscapes for preventing species extinctions[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2021, 30(5): 1341−1357 doi: 10.1007/s10531-021-02145-3
[7]	宁志中. 中国乡村地理[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019 NING Z Z. Rural Geography of China[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019
[8]	XIONG Y, LONG C L. An ethnoveterinary study on medicinal plants used by the Buyi people in Southwest Guizhou, China[J]. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2020, 16(1): 46 doi: 10.1186/s13002-020-00396-y
[9]	MARTELLO F, DOS SANTOS J S, SILVA-NETO C M, et al. Landscape structure shapes the diversity of plant reproductive traits in agricultural landscapes in the Brazilian Cerrado[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023, 341: 108216
[10]	王永生, 刘彦随. 中国乡村生态环境污染现状及重构策略[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 710−717 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.014 WANG Y S, LIU Y S. Pollution and restructuring strategies of rural ecological environment in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 710−717 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.014
[11]	ISBELL F, BALVANERA P, MORI A S, et al. Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Enviroment, 2022, 21(2): 94−103
[12]	ESTRADA-CARMONA N, SÁNCHEZ A C, REMANS R, et al. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: a global meta-analysis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(38): e2203385119
[13]	BOLAM F C, AHUMADA J, AKÇAKAYA H R, et al. Over half of threatened species require targeted recovery actions to avert human-induced extinction[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2023, 21(2): 64−70 doi: 10.1002/fee.2537
[14]	PLIENINGER T, DRAUX H, FAGERHOLM N, et al. The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 204−214 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.040
[15]	MCDONALD R I, MANSUR A V, ASCENSÃO F, et al. Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(1): 16−24
[16]	JARA T, HYLANDER K, NEMOMISSA S. Tree diversity across different tropical agricultural land use types[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2017, 240: 92−100
[17]	GADGIL M, BERKES F, FOLKE C. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation[J]. Ambio, 1993, 22(2/3): 151−156
[18]	ZIMMERER K S, DE HAAN S, JONES A D, et al. The biodiversity of food and agriculture (Agrobiodiversity) in the anthropocene: research advances and conceptual framework[J]. Anthropocene, 2019, 25: 100192 doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100192
[19]	RUSCH A, CHAPLIN-KRAMER R, GARDINER M M, et al. Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: a quantitative synthesis[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 221: 198−204
[20]	SUTHERLAND W J, BENNETT C, BROTHERTON P N M, et al. A global biological conservation horizon scan of issues for 2023[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 38(1): 96−107
[21]	VELLEND M, THOMPSON J R, DANNEYROLLES V, et al. Changes in landscape-scale tree biodiversity in the north-eastern USA since European settlement[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2021, 30(3): 666−673 doi: 10.1111/geb.13248
[22]	QIN H, LIAO T F. Labor out-migration and agricultural change in rural China: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47: 533−541 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.020
[23]	VAN SCHALKWYK J, PRYKE J S, SAMWAYS M J, et al. Maintaining high vegetation structural diversity in the landscape promotes arthropod diversity in dynamic production areas[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36(6): 1773−1785 doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01253-3