Relationship between policy incentives, ecological cognition, and organic fertilizer application by farmers: Based on a moderated mediation model

SANG Xiance; LUO Xiaofeng; HUANG Yanzhong; TANG Lin

doi:10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978

Volume 29 Issue 7

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture > 2021 > 29(7): 1274-1284

SANG Xiance, LUO Xiaofeng, HUANG Yanzhong, TANG Lin. Relationship between policy incentives, ecological cognition, and organic fertilizer application by farmers: Based on a moderated mediation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(7): 1274-1284. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978

Citation:

SANG Xiance, LUO Xiaofeng, HUANG Yanzhong, TANG Lin. Relationship between policy incentives, ecological cognition, and organic fertilizer application by farmers: Based on a moderated mediation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(7): 1274-1284. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978

Citation:

SANG Xiance, LUO Xiaofeng, HUANG Yanzhong, TANG Lin. Relationship between policy incentives, ecological cognition, and organic fertilizer application by farmers: Based on a moderated mediation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(7): 1274-1284. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978

PDF( 506 KB)

Relationship between policy incentives, ecological cognition, and organic fertilizer application by farmers: Based on a moderated mediation model

doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978

School of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University/Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430070, China

Funds:

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 72073048

the Soft Science Project of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China 202007

the National Social Science Foundation of China 20AZD091

More Information

Corresponding author: LUO Xiaofeng, E-mail: luoxiaofeng@mail.hzau.edu.cn
Received Date: 2020-12-10
Accepted Date: 2021-02-02
Publish Date: 2021-07-01

Abstract

Abstract

When striving to promote the green and high-quality development of agriculture, can policy incentives effectively guide the formation of ecological values and promote the application of organic fertilizer by farmers? Existing studies have not provided corresponding evidence. This article explored the relationships between policy incentives, ecological cognition, and organic fertilizer application by farmers to provide a useful reference for understanding organic fertilizer application by farmers, promote the substitution of organic fertilizer for chemical fertilizer, and realize the green development of agriculture. This study had specifically developed two aspects. First, it analyzed the mechanisms of policy incentives on organic fertilizer application by farmers from the perspective of ecological cognition and examined the decision-making mechanism of the farmers. Second, it considered the differences in the economic level of farmers. Low-income farmers had a lower ability to pay and bear risks; therefore, even if they were willing to adopt organic fertilizers, they struggled to translate this willingness into action. Thus, household income should be included in the analysis framework. Based on the survey data of 758 rice farmers in Hubei Province, this study used the entropy method to measure the ecological cognition of farmers and verified the influence mechanisms of policy incentives, ecological cognition on organic fertilizer application by farmers by constructing a moderated mediation model. This study focused on the mediating effect of ecological cognition in the process of policy incentives affecting organic fertilizer application by farmers and the moderating effect of household income in the process of policy incentives affecting organic fertilizer application by farmers through ecological cognition. The results showed that: 1) policy incentives had a significant positive (P < 5%) impact on organic fertilizer application by farmers. Government propaganda, training, and subsidies encouraged organic fertilizer use. 2) Ecological cognition played a partial intermediary role between policy incentives and organic fertilizer application by farmers, suggesting that policy incentives positively impact organic fertilizer applications via improved ecological cognition. 3) The indirect effect of policy incentives on organic fertilizer application by farmers through ecological cognition was positively regulated by household income. Increased household income significantly enhanced the influence of policy incentives on organic fertilizer application through ecological cognition. Based on these results, this study proposed the following policy implications. It is necessary to implement organic fertilizer policy incentives and to strengthen the role of the government in organic fertilizer promotion. The government should also consider ecological cognition of farmers when promoting organic fertilizers application. In the early promotion stages of organic fertilizer technology, high-income farmers can serve as an entry point to rapidly expand the use of organic fertilizers. Conversely, low-income farmers may represent difficult targets for future organic fertilizer promotion. Increased subsidies for the application of organic fertilizers to low-income farmers may help to reduce their economic risks.
- Policy incentives,
- Ecological cognition,
- Household income,
- Organic fertilizer application,
- Mediation model

FullText(HTML)

References(30)

References

[1]	孔祥智, 张琛, 张效榕. 要素禀赋变化与农业资本有机构成提高——对1978年以来中国农业发展路径的解释[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(10): 147-160 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.10.014 KONG X Z, ZHANG C, ZHANG X R. Change of factor endowment and improvement of agricultural capital organic composition: An explanation of China's agricultural development path since 1978[J]. Management World, 2018, 34(10): 147-160 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.10.014
[2]	史常亮, 郭焱, 朱俊峰. 中国粮食生产中化肥过量施用评价及影响因素研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2016, 37(4): 671-679 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH201604009.htm SHI C L, GUO Y, ZHU J F. Evaluation of over fertilization in China and its influencing factors[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2016, 37(4): 671-679 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH201604009.htm
[3]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2020[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020 National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2020[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2020
[4]	金书秦, 周芳, 沈贵银. 农业发展与面源污染治理双重目标下的化肥减量路径探析[J]. 环境保护, 2015, 43(8): 50-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJBU201508014.htm JIN S Q, ZHOU F, SHEN G Y. Feasible routes for reducing chemical fertilizer use with dual goals of agricultural development and non-point source pollution prevention[J]. Environmental Protection, 2015, 43(8): 50-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJBU201508014.htm
[5]	YANG Z C, ZHAO N, HUANG F, et al. Long-term effects of different organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments on soil organic carbon sequestration and crop yields on the North China Plain[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015, 146: 47-52 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.06.011
[6]	温延臣, 张曰东, 袁亮, 等. 商品有机肥替代化肥对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(11): 2136-2142 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.11.011 WEN Y C, ZHANG Y D, YUAN L, et al. Crop yield and soil fertility response to commercial organic fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(11): 2136-2142 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.11.011
[7]	朱海, 杨劲松, 姚荣江, 等. 有机无机肥配施对滨海盐渍农田土壤盐分及作物氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(3): 441-450 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180689 ZHU H, YANG J S, YAO R J, et al. Effects of partial substitution of organic nitrogen for inorganic nitrogen in fertilization on salinity and nitrogen utilization in salinized coastal soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(3): 441-450 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180689
[8]	王恒, 易小燕. 绿色发展背景下农户施肥及其决策行为研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(8): 1284-1292 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180976 WANG H, YI X Y. Advances in research on fertilization and decision-making behavior of farmers in the context of green development[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(8): 1284-1292 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180976
[9]	褚彩虹, 冯淑怡, 张蔚文. 农户采用环境友好型农业技术行为的实证分析——以有机肥与测土配方施肥技术为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012, (3): 68-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201203008.htm CHU C H, FENG S Y, ZHANG W W. An empirical analysis of farmers' adoption of environment-friendly agricultural technology behavior-Taking organic fertilizer and soil testing and formulated fertilization as an example[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2012, (3): 68-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201203008.htm
[10]	左喆瑜. 农户对环境友好型肥料的选择行为研究——以有机肥及控释肥为例[J]. 农村经济, 2015, (10): 72-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201510014.htm ZUO Z Y. Study on farmers' choice behavior of environment-friendly fertilizer: Based on organic manure and controlled-release fertilizer[J]. Rural Economy, 2015, (10): 72-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201510014.htm
[11]	姜太碧. 农村生态环境建设中农户施肥行为影响因素分析[J]. 西南民族大学学报: 人文社科版, 2015, 36(12): 157-161 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2015.12.025 JIANG T B. Influencing factors of farmers' fertilization behavior in rural ecological environment construction[J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities: Humanities and Social Science, 2015, 36(12): 157-161 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2015.12.025
[12]	曾杨梅, 张俊飚, 何可. 多维家庭资本视角下稻农有机肥采用意愿及其驱动因素研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(3): 332-338 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCST201903008.htm ZENG Y M, ZHANG J B, HE K. Driving factors of rice farmers' willingness to adopt organic fertilizer from the perspective of multidimensional family capital[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(3): 332-338 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCST201903008.htm
[13]	何丽娟, 王永强. 补贴政策、有机肥使用效果认知与果农有机肥使用行为——基于陕西省部分有机肥补贴试点县和非试点县的调查[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(8): 85-91 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201908012.htm HE L J, WANG Y Q. Subsidies on organic fertilizer, perception of the effect of organic fertilizer use and farmers' use of organic fertilizer[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(8): 85-91 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201908012.htm
[14]	黄炎忠, 罗小锋. 化肥减量替代: 农户的策略选择及影响因素[J]. 华南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2020, 19(1): 77-87 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNNA202001008.htm HUANG Y Z, LUO X F. Reduction and substitution of fertilizers: farmer's technical strategy choice and influencing factors[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University: Social Science Edition, 2020, 19(1): 77-87 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNNA202001008.htm
[15]	姚柳杨, 赵敏娟, 徐涛. 经济理性还是生态理性? 农户耕地保护的行为逻辑研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016, 16(5): 86-95, 156 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS201605009.htm YAO L Y, ZHAO M J, XU T. Economic rationality or ecological literacy? logic of peasant households' soil conservation practices[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 16(5): 86-95, 156 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS201605009.htm
[16]	于艳丽, 李桦, 薛彩霞, 等. 政府支持、农户分化与农户绿色生产知识素养[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2019, 19(6): 150-160 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS201906019.htm YU Y L, LI H, XUE C X, et al. Study on the influence of government support on farmers' green production knowledge under the adjustment of farmers' differentiation[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Social Science Edition, 2019, 19(6): 150-160 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS201906019.htm
[17]	张淑娴, 陈美球, 谢贤鑫, 等. 生态认知、信息传递与农户生态耕种采纳行为[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(8): 89-96 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX201908012.htm ZHANG S X, CHEN M Q, XIE X X, et al. Ecological cognition, information transmission and farmers' ecological farming adoption behavior[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(8): 89-96 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX201908012.htm
[18]	史常亮, 李赟, 朱俊峰. 劳动力转移、化肥过度使用与面源污染[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(5): 169-180 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYDX201605022.htm SHI C L, LI Y, ZHU J F. Rural labor transfer, excessive fertilizer use and agricultural non-point source pollution[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016, 21(5): 169-180 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYDX201605022.htm
[19]	PIGOU A C. The Economics of Welfare[M]. London: Macmillan, 1920
[20]	COASE R H. The problem of social cost[J]. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3: 1-44 doi: 10.1086/466560
[21]	朱利群, 王珏, 王春杰, 等. 有机肥和化肥配施技术农户采纳意愿影响因素分析——基于苏、浙、皖三省农户调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(3): 671-679 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803023 ZHU L Q, WANG J, WANG C J, et al. Analysis of influencing factors on farmers' adoption of the application technology of organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer-based on the survey of farmer households in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Anhui[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(3): 671-679 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803023
[22]	AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211 doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[23]	张化楠, 葛颜祥, 接玉梅, 等. 生态认知对流域居民生态补偿参与意愿的影响研究——基于大汶河的调查数据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(9): 109-116 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ201909012.htm ZHANG H N, GE Y X, JIE Y M, et al. A study on the influence of ecological cognition on river basin residents' willingness to participate in ecological compensation: based on the survey data from Dawen River basin[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(9): 109-116 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ201909012.htm
[24]	张童朝, 颜廷武, 何可, 等. 有意愿无行为: 农民秸秆资源化意愿与行为相悖问题探究——基于MOA模型的实证[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(9): 30-35 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201909005.htm ZHANG T C, YAN T W, HE K, et al. Contrary of farmers' willingness of straw utilization to the behavior: based on the MOA model[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(9): 30-35 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201909005.htm
[25]	邓正华, 张俊飚, 许志祥, 等. 农村生活环境整治中农户认知与行为响应研究——以洞庭湖湿地保护区水稻主产区为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2013, (2): 72-79 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201302010.htm DENG Z H, ZHANG J B, XU Z X, et al. Research on farmer's cognition and behavior response in rural living environment improvement: Taking Dongting Lake wetland reserve as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2013, (2): 72-79 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201302010.htm
[26]	PREACHER K J, RUCKER D D, HAYES A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007, 42(1): 185-227 doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316
[27]	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201405001.htm WEN Z L, YE B J. Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 731-745 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201405001.htm
[28]	Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach[J]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014, 51(3): 335-337 doi: 10.1111/jedm.12050
[29]	余威震, 罗小锋, 唐林, 等. 农户绿色生产技术采纳行为决策: 政策激励还是价值认同?[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(3): 318-324 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCST202003007.htm YU W Z, LUO X F, TANG L, et al. Farmers' adoption of green production technology: Policy incentive or value identification?[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(3): 318-324 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCST202003007.htm
[30]	曾杨梅, 张俊飚, 何可. 不同代际传递方式对稻农有机肥施用意愿的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(4): 644-653 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN201904015.htm ZENG Y M, ZHANG J B, HE K. The influence of intergenerational transmission of farming practices on organic fertilizer utilization willingness of rice producers[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(4): 644-653 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN201904015.htm