Effects of rotational pattern and fertilization application on soybean yield under straws returning of preceding crop

ZHANG Guowei; WANG Xiaojing; YANG Changqin; SHU Hongmei; LIU Ruixian

doi:10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210084

Volume 29 Issue 9

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture > 2021 > 29(9): 1493-1501

ZHANG G W, WANG X J, YANG C Q, SHU H M, LIU R X. Effects of rotational pattern and fertilization application on soybean yield under straws returning of preceding crop[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(9): 1493−1501 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210084

Citation:

PDF( 4072 KB)

Effects of rotational pattern and fertilization application on soybean yield under straws returning of preceding crop

doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210084

Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed in the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China

Funds: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0201000) and Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS[2020]152)

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: liuruixian2008@163.com
Received Date: 2021-02-09
Accepted Date: 2021-05-28

Available Online: 2021-07-13

Publish Date: 2021-09-06

Abstract

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted from 2018 to 2020 at the Soybean Experimental Station of the Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province. A split-plot design was used to study the effects of straw returning and fertilizer application on the nutrient utilization and yield of soybeans under different rotation patterns. The main plot factor was different rotation patterns with straw returning of preceding crop of soybean (wheat–soybean, garlic–soybean, leaf mustard–soybean, and winter fallow–soybean), while the sub-plot factor was fertilizer application (no fertilizer and nitrogen [N], phosphorus [P], and potassium [K] compound fertilizer [15∶15∶15] at 225 kg∙hm⁻²). The results showed that rotation pattern and fertilization application significantly affected the soybean yield and yield components under crop straw returning of preceding crop, and the two factors had significant interactive effects on the yield, yield components, plant morphological index, biomass, nitrogen accumulation and distribution, and disease rate of soybean, as well as soil total nitrogen, available nitrogen contents. Compared with the winter fallow–soybean planting pattern, the other three rotation patterns decreased soil bulk density and available nitrogen content but increased soil organic matter and total nitrogen contents. Plant height, stem diameter, height of the bottom pod, branch number per plant, total biomass, grain biomass, total nitrogen accumulation, and grain nitrogen accumulation were the highest under garlic–soybean and leaf mustard–soybean rotation patterns, which were beneficial for yield. The final yield increased by 4.40%–10.30% and 5.66%–7.09% under fertilization treatments and by 4.88%–8.23% and 2.19%–8.78% under no fertilization treatments compared to the winter fallow–soybean planting pattern, respectively. The wheat–soybean rotation pattern inhibited soybean plant growth, and the total biomass, grain biomass, total nitrogen accumulation, and grain nitrogen accumulation were the lowest. The harvest index of biomass and nitrogen and the nitrogen production efficiency were the highest, but the yield was the lowest in this case, decreasing by 2.80–7.30% in the fertilizer treatments and by 7.45%–11.18% in the no fertilizer treatment compared to the winter fallow–soybean planting pattern. Wheat straw returning increased the diseased plant rate, whereas the leaf mustard–soybean and garlic–soybean rotations decreased the rate of diseased plants. Compound fertilizer application promoted plant growth, reduced the rate of diseased plants, improved soil total nitrogen and available nitrogen contents, soybean biomass and nitrogen accumulation, and harvest density. Although harvest index and nitrogen use efficiency of soybean were low, the yield significantly increased. Compared with the no fertilizer application treatment, fertilizer application increased the soybean yields of the garlic–soybean, leaf mustard–soybean, and wheat–soybean rotations by 9.21%–13.01%, 7.97%–14.02%, and 15.00%–15.91%, respectively. Therefore, the garlic–soybean and leaf mustard–soybean rotation modes should be popularized. Under a wheat–soybean rotation pattern, high yield is achieved when wheat straw is returned to the field. In the wheat–soybean rotation, fertilizers must be applied after wheat straw is returned to the field to achieve high yield.
- Soybean,
- Rotation pattern,
- Straw returning,
- Fertilizer application,
- Yield

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	BLANCO-CANQUI H, LAL R. Corn stover removal impacts on micro-scale soil physical properties[J]. Geoderma, 2008, 145(3/4): 335−346
[2]	CHEN X W, ZHAO H B, LIU J F, et al. Winter wheat nitrogen utilization under different mulching practices on the Loess Plateau[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2020, 112(2): 1391−1405 doi: 10.1002/agj2.20105
[3]	ZUO Q S, KUAI J, ZHAO L, et al. The effect of sowing depth and soil compaction on the growth and yield of rapeseed in rice straw returning field[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 203: 47−54 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.016
[4]	穆心愿, 赵霞, 谷利敏, 等. 秸秆还田量对不同基因型夏玉米产量及干物质转运的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(1): 29−41 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.01.003 MU X Y, ZHAO X, GULI M, et al. Effects of straw returning amount on grain yield, dry matter accumulation and transfer in summer maize with different genotypes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 29−41 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.01.003
[5]	GASPAR E, NEVES H C. Chemical constituents in allelopathic straw of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 1995, 2(1): 79
[6]	董明辉, 顾俊荣, 陈培峰, 等. 麦秸还田与氮肥互作对大穗型杂交粳稻不同部位枝梗和颖花形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4437−4449 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.22.005 DONG M H, GU J R, CHEN P F, et al. Effects of interaction of wheat straw residue with field and nitrogen applications on branches and spikelets formation at different positions in large panicle hybrid rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22): 4437−4449 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.22.005
[7]	REBAFKA F P, HEBEL A, BATIONO A, et al. Short- and long-term effects of crop residues and of phosphorus fertilization on pearl millet yield on an acid sandy soil in Niger, West Africa[J]. Field Crops Research, 1994, 36(2): 113−124 doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(94)90060-4
[8]	PRASAD R, GANGAIAH B, AIPE K C. Effect of crop residue management in a rice-wheat cropping system on growth and yield of crops and on soil fertility[J]. Experimental Agriculture, 1999, 35(4): 427−435 doi: 10.1017/S001447979935403X
[9]	李彦斌, 刘建国, 程相儒, 等. 秸秆还田对棉花生长的化感效应[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 4942−4948 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.09.042 LI Y B, LIU J G, CHENG X R, et al. The allelopathic effects of returning cotton stalk to soil on the growth of succeeding cotton[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(9): 4942−4948 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.09.042
[10]	SINGH S, SAVOY H J, YIN X H, et al. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizer rate verification for a corn-wheat-soybean rotation system in Tennessee[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(4): 2060−2068 doi: 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0749
[11]	WU H W, HAIG T, PRATLEY J, et al. Biochemical basis for wheat seedling allelopathy on the suppression of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum)[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(16): 4567−4571 doi: 10.1021/jf025508v
[12]	王幸, 吴存祥, 齐玉军, 等. 麦秸处理和播种方式对夏大豆农艺性状及土壤物理性状的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(8): 1453−1465 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.08.003 WANG X, WU C X, QI Y J, et al. Effects of straw management and sowing methods on soybean agronomic traits and soil physical properties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(8): 1453−1465 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.08.003
[13]	李帆, 王静, 武际, 等. 尿素硝酸铵调节碳氮比促进小麦秸秆堆肥腐熟[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(5): 832−840 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18183 LI F, WANG J, WU J, et al. Fast production of wheat straw aerobic compost through regulating C/N ratio with urea ammonium nitrate solution[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(5): 832−840 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18183
[14]	HUANG T, YANG H, HUANG C C, et al. Effect of fertilizer N rates and straw management on yield-scaled nitrous oxide emissions in a maize-wheat double cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 204: 1−11 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.004
[15]	王建生, 李潇, 张海峰, 等. 大豆枯萎病菌尖孢镰孢遗传多样性及大豆品种抗性[J]. 植物病理学报, 2015, 45(2): 167−174 WANG J S, LI X, ZHANG H F, et al. Genetic diversity of Fusarium oxysporum and identification of resistance to soybean Fusarium wilt on soybean lines[J]. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2015, 45(2): 167−174
[16]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000 BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 2000
[17]	庄秋丽, 黄玉波, 姜秀芳, 等. 农作物秸秆还田及其有效还田方式的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(22): 38−41 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18050121 ZHUANG Q L, HUANG Y B, JIANG X F, et al. Straw returning and its effective returning method: research progress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(22): 38−41 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18050121
[18]	NAKANO H, MORITA S, SHIGEMORI H, et al. Plant growth inhibitory compounds from aqueous leachate of wheat straw[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2006, 48(3): 215−219
[19]	GONG B, BLOSZIES S, LI X, et al. Efficacy of garlic straw application against root-knot Nematodes on tomato[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 161: 49−57 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.06.027
[20]	MONFORT W S, CSINOS A S, DESAEGER J, et al. Evaluating Brassica species as an alternative control measure for root-knot nematode (M. incognita) in Georgia vegetable plasticulture[J]. Crop Protection, 2007, 26(9): 1359−1368 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.11.008
[21]	林郸, 李郁, 孙永健, 等. 不同轮作模式下秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交籼稻产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(10): 1581−1590 LIN D, LI Y, SUN Y J, et al. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen application on yield and quality of hybrid indica rice under different rotation patterns[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(10): 1581−1590
[22]	YANG R P, MO Y L, LIU C M, et al. The effects of cattle manure and garlic rotation on soil under continuous cropping of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.)[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(6): e0156515 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156515
[23]	王幸, 邢兴华, 徐泽俊, 等. 耕作方式和秸秆还田对黄淮海夏大豆产量和土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2017, 39(6): 834−841 doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.06.015 WANG X, XING X H, XU Z J, et al. Effects of tillage and straw returning on soybean yield and soil physicochemical properties in Yellow-Huai-Hai Rivers Valley[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2017, 39(6): 834−841 doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.06.015
[24]	王秋菊, 姜宇, 周鑫, 等. 豆麦轮作区麦秸长期还田对作物产量及土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24): 113−120 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.24.014 WANG Q J, JIANG Y, ZHOU X, et al. Effects of long-term wheat straw returned to field on crop yield and soil chemical properties in soybean-wheat rotation areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(24): 113−120 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.24.014
[25]	陈昱, 张福建, 范淑英, 等. 秸秆腐解物对豇豆连作土壤性质及幼苗生理指标的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(7): 1472−1479 doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.07.1472 CHEN Y, ZHANG F J, FAN S Y, et al. Effects of crop straw decomposition on the soil properties of the continuous cropping cowpea and the seedling physiological indexes[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(7): 1472−1479 doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.07.1472
[26]	崔喜安, 姜宇, 米刚, 等. 长期麦秸还田对暗棕壤土壤肥力和大豆产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2011, 30(6): 976−978 CUI X A, JIANG Y, MI G, et al. Effect of long-term application of wheat straw on fertility of dark brown soil and yield of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2011, 30(6): 976−978
[27]	史洪洲, 汪扬媚, 胡庭兴, 等. 核桃凋落叶分解对小麦生长的影响及施氮的缓解效应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(5): 818−825 SHI H Z, WANG Y M, HU T X, et al. Effects of decomposing walnut leaf litter on growth of wheat and counteracting effect of N fertilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2017, 23(5): 818−825