Volume 29 Issue 10
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HU N J, WANG Y T, CHEN Q, ZHU L Q. Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to adopt rice-crayfish co-culture andtheir heterogeneity[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(10): 1752−1761 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210281
Citation: HU N J, WANG Y T, CHEN Q, ZHU L Q. Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to adopt rice-crayfish co-culture and their heterogeneity[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(10): 1752−1761 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210281

Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to adopt rice-crayfish co-culture and their heterogeneity

doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210281
Funds:  This study was supported by the Youth Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20YJCZH044), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M651872) and Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX(18)3074]
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: zhulq@njau.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2021-05-09
  • Accepted Date: 2021-06-10
  • Available Online: 2021-07-15
  • Publish Date: 2021-10-01
  • In recent years, rice-crayfish co-culture has been vigorously promoted as an ecological agricultural mode. As a direct production decision-maker, farmers’ adoption intention and its influence mechanism should be clarified for the scientific promotion and sustainable development of rice-crayfish co-culture. Based on the questionnaire survey and on-the-spot interviews data of 603 farmers in five cities of Jiangsu Province, this study explored the influencing factors and their heterogeneity of farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode using the theory of planned behavior and ordered logistic model. Results show that: 1) 56.88% of the farmers in the sample were willing to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode, with income expectation as the key influencing factor. 2) Behavioral attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control had significant effects on farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode. The order of influence was as follows: perceptual behavior control > behavior attitude > subjective norm. 3) Under different qualifications, the factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode were heterogeneous. Specifically, complete infrastructure and part-time industrialization had a stronger influence on the willingness to adopt this mode of farmers with a high expected income. The farmers who were given subsidies and less affedcted by neighborhood had a stronger willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode. Farmers who were less influenced by the neighborhood had higher requirements for technical training and easeness of learning. The neighborhood effect, guidance of the agricultural technology department, difficulty of technical learning, and level of education had a significant positive effect on the willingness of farmers who participated in the technical training. Distributing subsidies and improving the guidance effect from agricultural technology departments could increase farmers’ willingness to adopt this mode in areas with incomplete infrastructure. Neighborhood effect and part-time employment had a negative impact on the difficulty of technology training, while the income expectation and environmental expectation stimulated farmers to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode. Based on these results, the following policy recommendations were put forward: firstly, the government should strengthen the technical training and guidance effect; second, farmland infrastructure should be improved; third, new agricultural management subjects should be fostered quickly; and finally, differentiated incentive and guidance policies should be formulated according to farmer types.
  • loading
  • [1]
    赵颖文, 吕火明. 粮食“十连增”背后的思考: 现代农业发展中面临的挑战与路径选择[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(4): 561−567

    ZHAO Y W, LÜ H M. The challenges and path selection in the development of modern agriculture in the background of 10 years of continuous growth of grain production in China[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2015, 36(4): 561−567
    [2]
    李文华. 中国生态农业面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(1): 1−3

    LI W H. The opportunity and challenge to ecological agriculture in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12(1): 1−3
    [3]
    张灿强, 沈贵银. 体系表征、多维困境与生态友好型农业的可能走向[J]. 改革, 2015, (5): 111−117

    ZHANG C Q, SHEN G Y. System characterization, multidimensional predicament and the possible trend of eco-friendly agriculture[J]. Reform, 2015, (5): 111−117
    [4]
    李文华, 刘某承, 闵庆文. 中国生态农业的发展与展望[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(6): 1015−1021

    LI W H, LIU M C, MIN Q W. Progress and perspectives of China’s ecological agriculture[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(6): 1015−1021
    [5]
    贺峰, 雷海章. 论生态农业与中国农业现代化[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 15(2): 23−26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.02.006

    HE F, LEI H Z. Ecological agriculture: a necessary choice for agricultural modernization in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(2): 23−26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.02.006
    [6]
    李金才, 张士功, 邱建军, 等. 我国生态农业模式分类研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(5): 1275−1278

    LI J C, ZHANG S G, QIU J J, et al. Categories of eco-agriculture models in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(5): 1275−1278
    [7]
    林孝丽, 周应恒. 稻田种养结合循环农业模式生态环境效应实证分析−以南方稻区稻-鱼模式为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(3): 37−42 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.007

    LIN X L, ZHOU Y H. An analysis on the eco-environment effect of circular agriculture mode of planting-culture in the paddy field[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(3): 37−42 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.007
    [8]
    农业农村部渔业渔政管理局, 全国水产技术推广总站, 中国水产学会. 中国小龙虾产业发展报告(2018)[J]. 中国水产, 2018, (7): 20−27

    Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Aquatic Technology Promotion Station, China Fishery Society. Report on the development of crayfish industry in China[J]. China Fisheries, 2018, (7): 20−27
    [9]
    曹凑贵, 江洋, 汪金平, 等. 稻虾共作模式的“双刃性”及可持续发展策略[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9): 1245−1253

    CAO C G, JIANG Y, WANG J P, et al. “Dual character” of rice-crayfish culture and strategy for its sustainable development[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(9): 1245−1253
    [10]
    杨彩艳, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹, 等. “稻虾共养”生态农业模式的化肥减量效应研究−基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的估计[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(3): 758−766

    YANG C Y, QI Z H, HUANG W H, et al. Study on the effect of chemical fertilizer reduction in the “shrimp and shrimp co-cultivation” ecological agriculture model: Estimation based on propensity score matching (PSM)[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(3): 758−766
    [11]
    李后建. 农户对循环农业技术采纳意愿的影响因素实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2012, (2): 28−36, 66

    LI H J. Empirical analysis on factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt circular agricultural technology[J]. China Rural Survey, 2012, (2): 28−36, 66
    [12]
    黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定: 市场收益还是政策激励?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 69−77

    HUANG W H, QI Z H, WU L Y, et al. Determinants of farmers’ willingness and behavior to engage in ecological circular agriculture: market returns or policy incentives?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 69−77
    [13]
    黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 农户认知、外部环境与绿色农业生产意愿−基于湖北省632个农户调研数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(3): 680−687 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803024

    HUANG Y Z, LUO X F, LI R R, et al. Farmer cognition, external environment and willingness of green agriculture production: based on the survey data of 632 farmers in Hubei Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(3): 680−687 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803024
    [14]
    杨兴杰, 齐振宏, 陈雪婷, 等. 社会资本对农户采纳生态农业技术决策行为的影响−以稻虾共养技术为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(6): 183−198 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.06.18

    YANG X J, QI Z H, CHEN X T, et al. Influence of social capital on farmers’ adoption of ecological agriculture technology decision-making behavior: taking rice and shrimp co-culture technology as example[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(6): 183−198 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.06.18
    [15]
    刘可, 齐振宏, 杨彩艳, 等. 邻里效应与农技推广对农户稻虾共养技术采纳的影响分析−互补效应与替代效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(2): 401−411

    LIU K, QI Z H, YANG C Y, et al. Analysis on the influence of neighbourhood effect and agricultural technology diffusion on farmer’s adoption of co-farming technology of rice and crayfish: complementary effects and substitution effects[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(2): 401−411
    [16]
    陈雪婷, 黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 等. 生态种养模式认知、采纳强度与收入效应−以长江中下游地区稻虾共作模式为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020, (10): 71−90

    CHEN X T, HUANG W H, QI Z H, et al. Farmers’ cognition, adoption intensity and income effect of ecological breeding mode: A case study of rice-shrimp co-cultivation mode in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. China Rural Survey, 2020, (10): 71−90
    [17]
    PAUL J, MODI A, PATEL J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2016, 29: 123−134 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006
    [18]
    刘可, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹, 等. 资本禀赋异质性对农户生态生产行为的影响研究: 基于水平和结构的双重视角分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 87−96

    LIU K, QI Z H, HUANG W H, et al. Study on the influence of capital endowment heterogeneity on farmers’ ecological production behavior: Based on the analysis of level and structure[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(2): 87−96
    [19]
    王学婷, 何可, 张俊飚, 等. 农户对环境友好型技术的采纳意愿及异质性分析−以湖北省为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(6): 197−209 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.06.22

    WANG X T, HE K, ZHANG J B, et al. Farmers’ willingness to adopt environment friendly technologies and their heterogeneity: Taking Hubei Province as an example[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018, 23(6): 197−209 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.06.22
    [20]
    吴雪莲, 张俊飚, 何可. 农户高效农药喷雾技术采纳意愿−影响因素及其差异性分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(4): 137−148 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.04.18

    WU X L, ZHANG J B, HE K. Farmers’ willingness to adopt the effective pesticide spraying technology: Influencing factors and group heterogeneity[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016, 21(4): 137−148 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.04.18
    [21]
    胡荣华. 农户兼业行为研究−以南京市为例的分析[J]. 南京社会科学, 2000, (7): 87−92

    HU R H. Study on the behavior of farmers in part-time employment: A case study of Nanjing[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2000, (7): 87−92
    [22]
    闵继胜, 孔祥智. 新型农业经营主体的模式创新与农业清洁生产−基于黑龙江仁发农机专业合作社的案例分析[J]. 江海学刊, 2017, (4): 67−73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-856X.2017.04.011

    MIN J S, KONG X Z. Mode innovation of new-type agricultural management entities and agricultural clean production: Case study based on Renfa professional cooperatives of agricultural machinery of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2017, (4): 67−73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-856X.2017.04.011
    [23]
    黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 农户对生态农业模式的偏好与额外投入水平研究−基于重庆市358户农户调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2016, (11): 34−43

    HUANG W H, QI Z H, WU L Y, et al. Research on farmers’ preference for ecological agriculture models and additional input levels: Based on survey data of 358 farmers from Chongqing City[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2016, (11): 34−43
    [24]
    谢贤鑫, 陈美球. 农户生态耕种采纳意愿及其异质性分析−基于TPB框架的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5): 1185−1196

    XIE X X, CHEN M Q. Farmers’ willingness to adopt ecological farming and their heterogeneity: based on the TPB framework[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5): 1185−1196
    [25]
    王志刚, 汪超, 许晓源. 农户认知和采纳创意农业的机制: 基于北京城郊四区果树产业的问卷调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2010, (4): 33−43

    WANG Z G, WANG C, XU X Y. The mechanism for farmers’ cognizing and adopting creative agricultural production method: an investigation based on fruit industry in four rural districts of Beijing City[J]. China Rural Survey, 2010, (4): 33−43
    [26]
    桑贤策, 罗小锋, 黄炎忠, 等. 政策激励、生态认知与农户有机肥施用行为−基于有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(7): 1274−1284 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978

    SANG X C, LUO X F, HUANG Y Z, et al. Policy incentives, ecological cognition and organic fertilizer application of farmers: A moderated mediation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(7): 1274−1284 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978
    [27]
    杨兴杰, 齐振宏, 陈雪婷, 等. 政府培训、技术认知与农户生态农业技术采纳行为−以稻虾共养技术为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(5): 198−208

    YANG X J, QI Z H, CHEN X T, et al. Government training, technology cognition and farmer eco-agricultural technology adoption behavior: taking rice shrimp co-culture technology as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(5): 198−208
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (227) PDF downloads(52) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return