Characteristics of structure and abundance of soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial community in alfalfa with different growing ages in the loess plateau
-
摘要: 生物固氮是紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)土壤氮素的重要来源, 固氮微生物数量及其群落结构变化对土壤氮素供应和肥力维持起着重要作用。本研究采用Illumina MiSeq测序和荧光定量PCR技术, 探究了黄绵土区玉米农田和不同种植年限(2019年、2012年、2003年)紫花苜蓿地土壤nifH固氮基因丰度、nifH固氮微生物群落结构和多样性, 通过共现网络分析丰富和稀有固氮微生物的生态地位, 耦合土壤理化性质明确影响固氮微生物群落结构的主导因子。结果表明, 黄绵土固氮微生物nifH基因丰度为2.97×106~5.93×106 copies∙g−1 (干土), 且表现为苜蓿地显著高于玉米农田。土壤样品经测序共获得有效序列176 367条, 主要分布在5门、8纲、11目、15科、17属。门水平上, 变形菌门和蓝藻门为主要优势类群; 属水平以斯克尔曼氏菌属和固氮弧菌属为优势属。与玉米农田相比, 多年持续种植紫花苜蓿显著提高了斯克尔曼氏菌属的相对丰度, 但其随种植年限延长呈降低趋势。长期种植紫花苜蓿促生了固氮菌属、伯克氏菌属、弗兰克氏菌属、中慢生根瘤菌属、地杆菌属和慢生根瘤菌属等生理类群, 同时也使得梭状杆菌属、红假单胞菌属和三离藻属消亡。RDA分析发现, 固氮微生物不同种群对环境因子的响应并不一致, 具有各自的生态位, 但土壤全磷是影响土壤固氮微生物群落结构的主导环境因子, 其次是有机碳和硝态氮。分子生态网络分析表明固氮菌生态网络中丰富类群占据生态系统核心地位, 且物种间均为协同合作关系, 群落结构相对稳定, 对环境变化具有较强的适应能力。综上, 黄土高原半干旱区种植紫花苜蓿显著提高了土壤nifH基因丰度, 改变了固氮微生物nifH群落结构, 该结果可为黄绵土固氮微生物多样性研究和紫花苜蓿适宜种植年限的确定提供基础数据和理论依据。Abstract: Biological nitrogen fixation is the major nitrogen source in alfalfa field, and nitrogen supply and soil fertility can be largely affected by the composition and quantity of the nitrogen-fixing bacterial community. In this study, a field experiment was conducted to explore soil nitrogen-fixing microbial community structure and abundance characteristics in loessal soil with alfalfa growing ages (2019, 2012, 2003), taking farmland as the control. The fluorogenic quantitative real-time PCR technique was adopted in the experiment using the high-throughput sequencing platform Illumina Miseq to target the nifH gene. We analyzed the ecological status of abundant and rare nitrogen-fixing microorganisms through co-occurrence networks, and identified the dominant factors affecting the community structure of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms by coupling soil physical and chemical properties. The results showed that long-term planting of alfalfa increased soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and soluble carbon content. The nifH gene abundance ranged from 2.97×106 copies∙g−1 to 5.93×106 copies∙g−1 in dry soil, being significantly higher in alfalfa field than in farmland. The correlation analysis between the abundance of nifH gene and physicochemical factors of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms showed that soil nifH gene abundance was positively correlated with bulk density (P=0.009) and soluble carbon content (P=0.005), positively correlated with total nitrogen (P=0.044) and available potassium content (P=0.013), and negatively correlated with total phosphorus content (P=0.000), and nitrate content (P=0.023). A total of 176367 valid sequences were obtained, belonging to 5 phyla, 8 classes, 11 orders, 15 families and 17 genera. Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were the dominant phyla, accounting for 95.9%−98.9% and 0.2%−1.8% of the total sequences of the samples; whereas Skermanella and Azohydromonas were the dominant genera, accounting for 82.2%−87.6% and 1.6%−4.6%. Compared with farmland, continuous alfalfa significantly increased the relative abundance of Skermanella, but the relative abundance decreased with the increase of alfalfa planting years. Long-term cultivation of alfalfa propagated the rare microbial taxa, including Azotobacter, Burkholderia, Frankia, Mesorhizobium, Geobacter and Bradyrhizobium, whereas Clostridium, Rhodopseudomonas and Trichormus were sterilized. RDA analysis showed that there was niche differentiation for nitrogen-fixing bacterial community in response to environmental factors, but soil total phosphorus, organic carbon and nitrate nitrogen were the dominant environmental factors for the nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure. The analysis of molecular ecological network showed that there were 520 nodes (OTUs) and 4170 edges in the network of nitrogen fixing microorganisms in maize field and alfalfa soil, among which 24 nodes belonged to rich group, 93 nodes belonged to rare group, and 403 nodes belonged to transitional group. There was one internal connection of rich taxa, 2187 internal connections of transitional taxa, and 358 internal connections of rare taxa. And nitrogen-fixing bacteria had a cooperative relationship in the ecological network, with relatively stable community structure and strong adaptability to environmental changes. This study provides basic data and theoretical basis for the diversity of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in loess soil and the determination of suitable planting period of alfalfa.
-
Key words:
- Medicago sativa /
- Loessal soil /
- nifH gene /
- Abundant taxa /
- Rare taxa /
- Eecological network
-
图 1 不同处理土壤固氮微生物Alpha多样性
Farmland、L2019、L2012、L2003分别表示农田、苜蓿种植时间为2019年、2012年和2003年。Farmland, L2019, L2012, and L2003 denote farmland and Medicago sativa planting years of 2019, 2012, and 2003, respectively.
Figure 1. Alpha diversity of soil nitrogen-fixing microbial communities under different treatments
图 2 不同处理土壤固氮菌非度量多维尺度分析
Farmland、L2019、L2012、L2003分别表示农田、苜蓿种植时间为2019年、2012年和2003年。Farmland, L2019, L2012, and L2003 denote farmland and Medicago sativa planting years of 2019, 2012, and 2003, respectively.
Figure 2. Nonmetric multidimensional scale analysis of soil nitrogen-fixing microbial communities under different treatments
图 3 不同处理土壤固氮微生物群落组成(门和属水平)
图中“*”表示P < 0.05, Farmland、L2019、L2012、L2003分别表示农田、苜蓿种植时间为2019年、2012年和2003年。In the figure, “*” means P < 0.05, and Farmland, L2019, L2012, and L2003 denote farmland and Medicago sativa planting years of 2019, 2012, and 2003, respectively.
Figure 3. Soil nitrogen-fixing microbial community composition at the phylum and genus levels under different treatments
图 4 土壤固氮微生物共生网络分析
A: 丰富和稀有类群; B: 核心和非核心类群; C: 核心类群; D: 共现网络; 图A、B和D中节点大小代表 OTUs 的度, 边的粗细为权重; 图C中节点大小为OTUs 的平均相对丰度。群落内部和外部边的连接数用黑色字体显示, 节点数根据不同分类显示; 图D中不同颜色的节点表示不同优势属。图中蓝色连接线为正连接, 红色连接线为负连接。A: abundant and rare taxa; B: core and non-core taxa; C: core taxa; D: co-occurrence network. Node size in figures A, B, and D represents the degree of OTUs, and edge thickness is weight; node size in Figure C is the average relative abundance of OTUs. The number of connections between the inner and outer edges of the community is shown in black font, and the number of nodes is shown according to different classifications; nodes with different colors in Figure D represent different dominant genera. The blue connection line in the figure is the positive connection, and the red connection line is the negative connection.
Figure 4. Symbiosis network analysis of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms
图 5 土壤固氮微生物群落与土壤理化因子冗余分析
AK、SBD、OC、TN、DOC、NO3−-N、NH4+-N、DON、TP、 pH分别表示土壤速效钾、容重、有机碳、全氮、可溶性碳、硝态氮、铵态氮、可溶性氮、全磷和pH, Farmland、L2019、L2012、L2003分别表示农田、苜蓿种植时间为2019年、2012年和2003年; Skermanella、Azohydromonas、Nostoc、Methylobacter、Sinorhizobium、Anabaena、Paenibacillus、Azotobacter、Burkholderia、Frankia、Clostridium、Mesorhizobium、Rhodopseudomonas、Trichormus、Geobacter、Bradyrhizobium、Rhodomicrobium分别表示斯克尔曼氏菌属、固氮弧菌属、念珠藻属、甲基杆菌属、中华根瘤菌属、鱼腥藻属、类芽孢杆菌属、 固氮菌属、伯克氏菌属、弗兰克氏菌属、梭状杆菌属、中慢生根瘤菌属、红假单胞菌属、三离藻属、地杆菌属、慢生根瘤菌属和红微菌属。AK, SBD, OC, TN, DOC, NO3−-N, NH4+-N, DON, TP, pH represent soil available potassium, bulk density, organic carbon, total nitrogen, soluble carbon, nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, respectively, soluble nitrogen, total phosphorus and pH, Farmland, L2019, L2012, L2003 denote farmland and Medicago sativa planting years of 2019, 2012, and 2003, respectively.
Figure 5. Redundancy analysis of soil nitrogen-fixing microbial community structure at the genus level and soil physicochemical properties
表 1 目标基因的引物名称及引物序列
Table 1. Primer names and primer sequences of target genes
目标基因 Target gene 引物 Prime 引物序列 Sequence PCR反应条件 PCR condition nifH gene nifH-F 5′-AAA GGYGGW ATC GGY AAR TCC ACC AC-3′ 95 ℃ 预变性 3 min 1cycle;
95 ℃ 变性 30 s; 56 ℃ 退火 30 s;
72 ℃ 延伸 40 s, 35 个循环。nifH-R 5′-TTG TTS GCS GCR TACATS GCC ATC AT-3′ 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同处理土壤理化性状和nifH基因丰度
Table 2. Soil physicochemical properties and nifH gene abundance under different treatments
项目 Item Farmland L2019 L2012 L2003 容重 Bulk density (g∙cm−3) 1.18±0.01a 1.21±0.01a 1.23±0.02a 1.25±0.03a 有机碳 Organic carbon (g∙kg−1) 9.86±0.11b 9.79±0.14b 10.48±0.26b 11.65±0.30a 全氮 Total nitrogen (g∙kg−1) 0.98±0.04c 0.96±0.05c 1.13±0.01b 1.28±0.02a 全磷 Total phosphorus (g∙kg−1) 0.82±0.01a 0.74±0.01bc 0.76±0.01b 0.72±0.01c 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen (mg∙kg−1) 17.41±0.19a 11.55±0.46c 11.42±0.14c 13.94±0.71b 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen (mg∙kg−1) 1.68±0.05b 2.67±0.07a 2.92±0.05a 1.99±0.20b 可溶性碳 Dissolved organic C (mg∙kg−1) 109.59±5.14b 118.96±3.84b 119.55±2.36b 134.65±2.63a 可溶性氮 Dissolved organic N (mg∙kg−1) 56.17±4.70a 41.66±3.45a 47.92±0.54a 53.55±3.49a 速效钾 Available potassium (mg∙kg−1) 155.50±9.02a 183.33±9.44a 177.00±2.26a 184.83±3.24a pH 8.42±0.06a 8.58±0.07a 8.65±0.06a 8.55±0.07a nifH基因丰度 Abundance of nifH gene [×106 copy∙g−1(dry soil)] 2.97±0.30c 5.21±0.29ab 4.54±0.32b 5.93±0.26a 数据为平均值±标准误(n=3), 同行不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05), Farmland、L2019、L2012、L2003分别表示农田、苜蓿种植时间为2019年、2012年和2003年。Data in table are mean ± standard error (n=3). Different lowercase letters in the same line indicate significant difference between different treatments (P<0.05). Farmland, L2019, L2012, and L2003 denote farmland and Medicago sativa planting years of 2019, 2012, and 2003, respectively.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 固氮菌nifH基因丰度与环境因子的相关系数
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between nitrogen-fixing bacteria nifH gene abundance and environmental factors
nifH SBD OC TN TP NO3−-N NH4+-N DOC DON AK pH nifH 1.000 SBD 0.714** 1.000 OC 0.511 0.420 1.000 TN 0.589* 0.529 0.936** 1.000 TP −0.865** −0.618* −0.522 −0.498 1.000 NO3−−N −0.646* −0.462 −0.027 −0.141 0.651* 1.000 NH4+−N 0.305 0.275 −0.085 −0.026 −0.355 −0.818** 1.000 DOC 0.750** 0.451 0.795** 0.815** −0.725** −0.351 0.022 1.000 DON −0.326 −0.283 0.235 0.264 0.281 0.590* −0.686* 0.217 1.000 AK 0.688* 0.267 0.341 0.371 −0.604* −0.585* 0.398 0.509 −0.233 1.000 pH 0.531 0.664* 0.109 0.281 −0.308 −0.612* 0.619* 0.165 −0.435 0.492 1.000 **: P<0.01; *: P<0.05.
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] KUYPERS M M M, MARCHANT H K, KARTAL B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018, 16(5): 263−276 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9 [2] GALLOWAY J N, TOWNSEND A R, ERISMAN J W, et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5878): 889−892 doi: 10.1126/science.1136674 [3] 靳海洋, 王慧, 张燕辉, 等. 基于基因组的一株土壤固氮菌分离菌株鉴定及其促生作用[J]. 微生物学报, 2021, 61(10): 3249−3263JIN H Y, WANG H, ZHANG Y H, et al. Genome-based identification and plant growth promotion of a nitrogen-fixing strain isolated from soil[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2021, 61(10): 3249−3263 [4] DOS SANTOS P C, FANG Z, MASON S W, et al. Distribution of nitrogen fixation and nitrogenase-like sequences amongst microbial genomes[J]. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13: 162 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-162 [5] 李建宏, 李雪萍, 卢虎, 等. 高寒地区不同退化草地植被特性和土壤固氮菌群特性及其相关性[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11): 3647−3654LI J H, LI X P, LU H, et al. Characteristics of, and the correlation between, vegetation and N-fixing soil bacteria in alpine grassland showing various degrees of degradation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 3647−3654 [6] 董志新, 孙波, 殷士学, 等. 气候条件和作物对黑土和潮土固氮微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1): 130−138DONG Z X, SUN B, YIN S X, et al. Impacts of climate and cropping on community diversity of diazotrophs in pachic udic argiboroll and fluventic ustochrept[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(1): 130−138 [7] 胡斌, 段昌群, 王震洪, 张世彪, 起联春. 植被恢复措施对退化生态系统土壤酶活性及肥力的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(4): 604−608 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2002.04.022HU B, DUAN C Q, WANG Z H, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil enzyme activities and soil fertility in degraded ecosystem[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(4): 604−608 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2002.04.022 [8] 张晶, 张惠文, 李新宇, 等. 土壤微生物生态过程与微生物功能基因多样性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(6): 1129−1132 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2006.06.034ZHANG J, ZHANG H W, LI X Y, et al. Soil microbial ecological process and microbial functional gene diversity[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(6): 1129−1132 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2006.06.034 [9] TANG H. Effects of long-term fertilization on nifH gene diversity in agricultural black soil[J]. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2012, 6(11): 2659−2666 [10] 赵辉, 周运超. 不同母岩发育马尾松土壤固氮菌群落结构和丰度特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(17): 6189−6201ZHAO H, ZHOU Y C. Characteristics of structure and abundance of the nitrogen-fixing bacterial community in Pinus massoniana soil developed from different parent rocks[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(17): 6189−6201 [11] 孙启忠, 柳茜, 那亚, 等. 我国汉代苜蓿引入者考[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 240−253SUN Q Z, LIU Q, NA Y, et al. The history of the introduction of alfalfa to China in the Han dynasty[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(1): 240−253 [12] 古丽娜扎尔·艾力, 陶海宁, 王自奎, 等. 基于APSIM模型的黄土旱塬区苜蓿−小麦轮作系统深层土壤水分及水分利用效率研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 22−33GULNAZAR A, TAO H N, WANG Z K, et al. Evaluating the deep-horizon soil water content and water use efficiency in the alfalfa-wheat rotation system on the dryland of Loess Plateau using APSIM[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 22−33 [13] 江影舟, 南志标, 王丽佳. 基于钻石模型理论的甘肃省苜蓿产业竞争力分析[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(4): 813−820JIANG Y Z, NAN Z B, WANG L J. Competitiveness of alfalfa industry in Gansu Province—a diamond model[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(4): 813−820 [14] 马欣, 罗珠珠, 张耀全, 等. 黄土高原雨养区不同种植年限紫花苜蓿土壤细菌群落特征与生态功能预测[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 54−67 doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020381MA X, LUO Z Z, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Distribution characteristics and ecological function predictions of soil bacterial communities in rainfed alfalfa fields on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 54−67 doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020381 [15] 韩清芳, 周芳, 贾珺, 等. 施肥对不同品种苜蓿生产力及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6): 1413−1418 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.06.024HAN Q F, ZHOU F, JIA J, et al. Effect of fertilization on productivity different producing performance alfalfa varieties and soil fertility[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(6): 1413−1418 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.06.024 [16] 李裕元, 邵明安. 黄土高原北部紫花苜蓿草地退化过程与植物多样性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(12): 2321−2327LI Y Y, SHAO M A. Degradation process and plant diversity of alfalfa grassland in North Loess Plateau of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(12): 2321−2327 [17] 李玉山. 苜蓿生产力动态及其水分生态环境效应[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3): 404−411 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2002.03.016LI Y S. Productivity dynamic of alfalfa and its effects on water eco-environment[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(3): 404−411 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2002.03.016 [18] 万素梅, 胡守林, 贾志宽, 等. 黄土高原地区苜蓿生产力动态及其土壤水分消耗规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(12): 30−34 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2007.12.006WAN S M, HU S L, JIA Z K, et al. Alfalfa productivity dynamics and consumption of soil water in the Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(12): 30−34 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2007.12.006 [19] 才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 等. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27−38CAI L, WANG L L, LUO Z Z, et al. Meta-analysis of alfalfa yield and WUE response to growing ages in China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 27−38 [20] 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 牛伊宁, 等. 陇中黄土高原半干旱区苜蓿地土壤干燥化特征及适宜种植年限[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10): 3059−3065LUO Z Z, LI L L, NIU Y N, et al. Soil dryness characteristics of alfalfa cropland and optimal growth years of alfalfa on the Loess Plateau of central Gansu, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(10): 3059−3065 [21] WANG L L, XIE J H, LUO Z Z, et al. Forage yield, water use efficiency, and soil fertility response to alfalfa growing age in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 243: 106415 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106415 [22] 牟红霞, 张文文, 刘秉儒. 黄灌区不同种植年限紫花苜蓿土壤真菌群落多样性特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(4): 91−96+104MU H X, ZHANG W W, LIU B R. Diversity characteristics of alfalfa soil fungal community with different planting years in the Yellow River Irrigation Area[J]. Research on Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(4): 91−96+104 [23] 陈燕霞, 唐晓东, 杨恒山. 不同种植年限苜蓿地亚硝化菌、反硝化菌和固氮菌的垂直分布[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2017, 36(2): 49−52CHEN Y X, TANG X D, YANG H S. Vertical distribution of nitrifying bacteria, denitrifying bacteria and nitrogen-fixing bacteria in alfalfa with different planting years[J]. Journal of Mountain Agricultural Biology, 2017, 36(2): 49−52 [24] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000 [25] POLY F, RANJARD L, NAZARET S, et al. Comparison of nifH gene pools in soils and soil microenvironments with contrasting properties[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67(5): 2255−2262 doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2255-2262.2001 [26] 段鹏飞, 陈彦, 张菲, 等. 芒草种植对土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(6): 2030−2038DUAN P F, CHEN Y, ZHANG F, et al. Effect of Miscanthus planting on the structure and function of soil bacterial community[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(6): 2030−2038 [27] 江晓亮. 典型湿地硝化、反硝化微生物的群落特征及构建机制[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院武汉植物园), 2021JIANG X L. The geographic distribution patterns and assembly mechanisms of nitrifying-and denitrifying microbial communities in the typical wetland eecosystems[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021 [28] ZOU Y K, ZHANG J N, YANG D L, et al. Effects of different land use patterns on nifH genetic diversity of soil nitrogen-fixing microbial communities in Leymus Chinensis steppe[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(3): 150−156 doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2011.03.004 [29] LEVY-BOOTH D J, WINDER R S. Quantification of nitrogen reductase and nitrite reductase genes in soil of thinned and clear-cut Douglas-fir stands by using real-time PCR[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(21): 7116−7125 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02188-09 [30] JURAEVA D, GEORGE E, DAVRANOV K, et al. Detection and quantification of the nifH gene in shoot and root of cucumber plants[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2006, 52(8): 731−739 doi: 10.1139/w06-025 [31] MORTENSON L E. Ferredoxin and atp, requirements for nitrogen fixation in cell-free extracts of Clostridium pasteurianum[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1964, 52(2): 272−279 doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.2.272 [32] HERBERT R. Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1999, 23(5): 563−590 [33] COELHO M R R, MARRIEL I E, JENKINS S N, et al. Molecular detection and quantification of nifH gene sequences in the rhizosphere of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) sown with two levels of nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009, 42(1): 48−53 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.01.010 [34] SMERCINA D N, EVANS S E, FRIESEN M L, et al. Erratum for smercina et al., to fix or not to fix: controls on free-living nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2019, 85(22): e02103−e02119 [35] ZHANG X M, LIU W, SCHLOTER M, et al. Response of the abundance of key soil microbial nitrogen-cycling genes to multi-factorial global changes[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e76500 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076500 [36] 沈秋兰, 何冬华, 徐秋芳, 等. 阔叶林改种毛竹(Phyllostachys pubescens)后土壤固氮细菌nifH基因多样性的变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 687−696SHEN Q L, HE D H, XU Q F, et al. Variation of nif H gene diversity of soil nitrogen-fixing bacteria in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) plantation converted from broadleaf forest[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(3): 687−696 [37] 彭琪, 何红花, 张兴昌. 低磷环境下接种丛枝菌根真菌促进紫花苜蓿生长和磷素吸收的机理[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(2): 293−300PENG Q, HE H H, ZHANG X C. Mechanisms of increasing alfalfa growth and phosphorus uptake by inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal under low phosphorus application level[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(2): 293−300 [38] 靳希桐, 胡文革, 贺帅兵, 等. 不同时期艾比湖湿地盐角草群落土壤固氮微生物的多样性分析[J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(8): 1600−1611JIN X T, HU W G, HE S B, et al. Diversity of soil nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in Salicornia europaea community of Ebinur Lake wetland during different periods[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2019, 59(8): 1600−1611 [39] 汪堃, 南丽丽, 师尚礼, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同根型苜蓿根系生长及根际土壤细菌的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 7735−7742WANG K, NAN L L, SHI S L, et al. Influence of root growth and bacterial community in the rhizosphere of different root types of alfalfa under drought stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(19): 7735−7742 [40] 刘洋, 黄懿梅, 曾全超. 黄土高原不同植被类型下土壤细菌群落特征研究[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(10): 3931−3938LIU Y, HUANG Y M, ZENG Q C. Soil bacterial communities under different vegetation types in the loess plateau[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(10): 3931−3938 [41] LI Y Y, PAN F X, YAO H Y. Response of symbiotic and asymbiotic nitrogen-fixing microorganisms to nitrogen fertilizer application[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019, 19(4): 1948−1958 doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-2192-z [42] 陈玉真, 王峰, 吴志丹, 等. 林地转变为茶园对土壤细菌群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(4): 97−106CHEN Y Z, WANG F, WU Z D, et al. Effects of forestland to tea garden conversion on soil bacterial community and diversity[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(4): 97−106 [43] KIM J N, HENRIKSEN E D, CANN I K O, et al. Nitrogen utilization and metabolism in Ruminococcus albus 8[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(10): 3095−3102 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00029-14 [44] 于文清, 肖俊杰, 刘文志, 等. 类芽胞杆菌(Paenibacillus)对植物促生御病机理研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2020, 40(6): 102−112YU W Q, XIAO J J, LIU W Z, et al. Advances in mechanisms of Paenibacillus to promote growth & diseases-defending in plant[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2020, 40(6): 102−112 [45] YEGORENKOVA I V, TREGUBOVA K V, KRASOV A I, et al. Effect of exopolysaccharides of Paenibacillus polymyxa rhizobacteria on physiological and morphological variables of wheat seedlings[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2021, 59(8): 729−735 doi: 10.1007/s12275-021-0623-9 [46] FAN K K, DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M, GUO X S, et al. Suppressed N fixation and diazotrophs after four decades of fertilization[J]. Microbiome, 2019, 7(1): 143 doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0757-8 [47] 李荣, 贾霞珍, 胡建坤, 等. 天津于桥水库嗅味物质来源及变化原因分析[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(6): 37−43LI R, JIA X Z, HU J K, et al. Analysis on origin and change of odor substances of water body in Yuqiao Reservoir of Tianjin[J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 40(6): 37−43 [48] 魏继华, 李佳益, 何彩云. 弗兰克氏菌共生固氮与分离培养技术研究进展[J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(2): 56−61WEI J H, LI J Y, HE C Y. Research progress on symbiotic nitrogen fixation and isolation culture of Frankia[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 46(2): 56−61 [49] 王庆贵, 张晓莹. 土壤微生物对大气氮沉降的响应研究进展[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(6): 11−18,69WANG Q G, ZHANG X Y. Response of soil microorganisms to atmospheric nitrogen deposition: a review[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(6): 11−18,69 [50] JIA X, DINI-ANDREOTE F, FALCÃO SALLES J. Community assembly processes of the microbial rare biosphere[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2018, 26(9): 738−747 doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.02.011 [51] 吴宪, 胡菏, 王蕊, 等. 化肥减量和有机替代对潮土微生物群落分子生态网络的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(2): 545−556WU X, HU H, WANG R, et al. Effects of reduction of chemical fertilizer and substitution coupled with organic manure on the molecular ecological network of microbial communities in fluvo-aquic soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(2): 545−556 [52] LAYEGHIFARD M, HWANG D M, GUTTMAN D S. Disentangling interactions in the microbiome: a network perspective[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2017, 25(3): 217−228 doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.008 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 85
- HTML全文浏览量: 42
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
