加入合作社对家庭农场绿色生产的影响

张明月; 郑军; 赵晓颖

doi:10.12357/cjea.20220817

加入合作社对家庭农场绿色生产的影响基于422家省级示范家庭农场的实证分析

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220817

张明月^1,,
郑军^1, ,,
赵晓颖²

1.
山东农业大学经济管理学院　泰安　271018
2.
山东科技大学财经学院　泰安　271019

基金项目: 国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL160)、教育部人文社科规划基金青年项目(22YJC790163)和山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2021QG009)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
张明月, 主要研究方向为农业经济管理。E-mail: zhangmingyue3@163.com

通讯作者:
郑军, 主要研究方向为农业经济理论与政策。E-mail: zhengjun9200@126.com

中图分类号: F323.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 13
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-20
- 录用日期: 2023-01-12
- 修回日期: 2023-02-02
- 网络出版日期: 2023-02-10

Impact of joining cooperatives on green production of family farms: an empirical analysis based on 422 provincial demonstration family farms

1.
School of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
2.
School of Finance and Economics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai’an 271019, China

Funds: The study was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (19BGL160), the Humanities and Social Science Planning Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (22YJC790163) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QG009).

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: zhengjun9200@126.com

摘要

摘要: 绿色生产是农业可持续发展的必由之路, 家庭农场作为现代农业的关键主体, 探索其绿色生产的有效方式具有重要理论价值和现实意义。本文基于山东省422家省级示范家庭农场的调研数据, 运用排序选择模型和解释结构模型, 实证分析家庭农场加入合作社对其绿色生产的影响。研究发现: 1)加入合作社可以显著促进家庭农场绿色生产, 且对节水灌溉、施用有机肥、水肥一体化的促进作用更明显。2)不同农场加入合作社后的绿色生产行为存在明显差异, 作为领办人的农场要优于作为普通社员的农场, 粮食、蔬菜类农场显著, 中等规模(10~20人)农场显著。3)家庭农场的经营类型、劳动力数量、产品质量认证、原产地追溯、绿色生产认知和意愿均对其绿色生产产生影响。4)解释结构模型发现, 加入合作社作为深层根源因素直接影响家庭农场绿色生产认知, 并进而影响绿色生产意愿, 最终促成绿色生产行为。为此, 应鼓励并支持家庭农场加入合作社, 重视农场间的异质性, 通过合作社的培训与监督促进农场绿色生产。
- 绿色生产 /
- 家庭农场 /
- 参与合作社 /
- 排序选择模型 /
- 解释结构模型
Abstract: Green production is the only way for the sustainable development of agriculture. As the key subject of modern agriculture, it is of great theoretical value and practical significance to explore the effective ways of green production for family farms. We should study the value and the significance of the times. Based on the investigation data of 422 provincial demonstration family farms in Shandong Province, this paper empirically analyzes the influence of family farms joining cooperatives on their green production and its mechanism by using the ranking selection model and explanatory structure model. The conclusions were as follows: 1) quantitative analysis shows that the proportion of green production of family farms joining cooperatives is obviously higher than that of farms not joining cooperatives. 2) From the analysis of heterogeneity, it is found that the proportion of green production of farms that are leaders in cooperatives is obviously higher than that of farms that are ordinary members. Joining cooperatives is significant for the green production of grain and vegetable family farms, but not for other farms such as fruit and livestock breeding. Joining the cooperative has a significant impact on the green production of medium-sized (10-20 people) farms, but has no significant impact on the behavior of small-scale (less than 10 people) and large-scale (more than 20 people) farms. 3) After the family farm joined the cooperative, the three types of green production behaviors with the highest adoption rate are applying organic fertilizer (74.35%), water-saving irrigation (68.17%) and subsoiling (65.80%), and the three types of green production behaviors with the lowest adoption rate are ecological treatment of livestock and poultry breeding waste (26.84%), recycling pesticide waste (41.81%) and integration of water and fertilizer. 4) from the estimation results of regression equation, family farms can significantly increase the possibility of green production by joining cooperatives. Under the control of other variables, joining the cooperative has a significant positive impact on the green production of family farms at the level of 1%, with an impact coefficient of 0.554, and the promotion of water-saving irrigation, application of organic fertilizer and integration of water and fertilizer is more obvious. After taking other control variables into account, family farm management type, labor force, product quality certification, traceability of origin, awareness and willingness of green production all have influences on its green production. 5) From the analysis of the explanatory structure model, it is found that seven significant influencing factors not only play an independent role, but also are interrelated, forming a complete chain of influencing factors for family farms to participate in green production. Joining the cooperative as a deep-rooted factor directly affects the origin traceability and product quality certification of family farm products, and then affects the green production of family farms from the source along the positive conduction relationship of “family farm green production cognition→green production willingness→green production behavior”. Therefore, we should encourage and support family farms to join cooperatives, pay attention to the heterogeneity between farms, and promote green production of farms through training and supervision of cooperatives.
- Green production /
- Family farms /
- Participating cooperatives /
- Ranking selection model /
- Explanatory structural model

HTML全文

图 1 家庭农场加入合作社与其绿色生产关系图

Figure 1. Relationship between family farms joining cooperatives and their green production

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 家庭农场参与绿色生产影响因素间的逻辑关系

Figure 2. Logical relationship among influencing factors of family farm participation in green production

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 家庭农场参与绿色生产影响因素间的骨干矩阵

Figure 3. Backbone matrix of influencing factors of family farm participation in green production

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 家庭农场参与绿色生产的影响因素的解释结构模型

Figure 4. Explanatory structural model of influencing factors of family farm participation in green production

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 数据来源区域及家庭农场数量分布

Table 1. Data source areas and quantity distribution of family farms

地区 Region	数量 Amount	地区 Region	数量 Amount	地区 Region	数量 Amount	地区 Region	数量 Amount
济南市 Jinan	43	泰安市 Tai’an	21	东营市 Dongying	21	德州市 Dezhou	34
青岛市 Qingdao	52	威海市 Weihai	14	烟台市 Yantai	19	聊城市 Liaocheng	17
淄博市 Zibo	18	日照市 Rizhao	15	潍坊市 Weifang	44	滨州市 Binzhou	21
枣庄市 Zaozhuang	19	临沂市 Linyi	44	济宁市 Jining	23	菏泽市 Heze	16

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 家庭农场样本的基本特征

Table 2. Basic characteristics of the sampled family farms

农场主特征 Farmer characteristics	分类 Type	数量 Household	比例 Ratio (%)	农场基础特征 Farm base features	分类 Type	数量 Household	比例 Ratio (%)
性别 Sex	男	333	79.10	农场经营年限 Farm operating years (a)	<5	21	4.99
性别 Sex	女	88	20.90		5~7	240	57.01
年龄 Age	≤30	6	1.43		8~10	156	37.05
	31~40	52	12.35		>10	4	1.00
	41~50	144	34.20	农场土地经营面积 Farm land area (hm²)	≤6.67	57	13.54
	51~60	185	43.94		< 6.67~13.33	107	25.42
	≥60	34	8.08		< 13.33~33.33	165	39.19
教育程度 Education	小学及以下 Primary school and below	7	1.66		< 33.33~66.7	59	14.01
	初中 Junior school	108	25.65		≥66.7	33	7.84
	高中或中专 High school or technical secondary school	188	44.66	农业劳动力数量 Agricultural labor force (persons)	≤5	140	33.25
	大专或高职 College or higher vocational education	90	21.38		≥6~10	153	36.34
	大学及以上 University and above	28	6.65		≥11~20	87	20.67
	大学及以上 University and above	28	6.65		>20	41	9.74

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 家庭农场绿色生产相关变量定义及数据特征

Table 3. Definition and data characteristics of variables related to green production in family farms

变量类型 Variable type	变量名 Variable name	定义及赋值 Definition and assignment	平均值 Mean		标准差 Standard deviation
变量类型 Variable type	变量名 Variable name	定义及赋值 Definition and assignment	参与合作社 Participating in a cooperative	未参与合作社 Not participating in a cooperative	标准差 Standard deviation
被解释变量 Explained variable	绿色生产 Green Production (Y)	采纳绿色生产行为累计加总值 A number of green production behavior cumulative total value	5.672	5.000	2.278
核心解释变量 Core explanatory variable	是否加入合作社 Whether to join a cooperative (X₁)	否=0, 是=1 No=0; yes=1	1.000	0	0.457
控制变量 Control variables	性别 Gender (X₂)	女=0, 男=1 Female=0, male=1	0.769	0.806	0.407
	年龄 Age (X₃)	负责人实际年龄 Actual age of person in charge	48.902	49.435	8.894
	受教育程度 Education Level (X₄)	小学及以下=1, 初中=2, 高中或中专=3, 大专或高职=4, 大学及以上=5 Primary school or below=1, Junior high school=2, high school or technical secondary school=3, Junior college or vocational college=4, college or above=5	3.000	3.097	0.895
	经营类型 Type of Business (X₅)	粮食=1, 蔬菜=2, 水果=3, 畜禽养殖=4, 其他=5 Grain=1, vegetable=2, fruit=3, livestock and poultry breeding=4, other=5	2.392	2.723	1.330
	农场经营年限 Years of farm operation (X₆)	实际注册年限 Actual years of registration	6.740	6.980	1.323
	农场土地面积 Farm land area (hm²) (X₇)	实际面积数: 对数处理 Actual area number: logarithmic treatment	2.480	2.369	0.433
	农场劳动力数量 Number of farm labor (X₈)	实际人数 Actual number (persons)	10.734	10.665	11.593
	产品销售质检 Product Sales Quality Inspection (X₉)	农产品销售过程是否有质检: 否=0, 是=1 Whether there is quality inspection in the sales process of agricultural products: No=0; Yes=1	0.821	0.794	0.396
	产品原产地追溯 Product origin tracing (X₁₀)	农场产品是否能实现原产地可追溯: 否=0, 是=1 Whether farm products can be traceability of origin: no=0, yes=1	0.780	0.661	0.454
	产品质量认证 Product Quality Certification (X₁₁)	农场农产品是否“三品一标”: 否=0, 是=1 Farm produce whether "three products a standard" : no=0, yes=1	0.561	0.520	0.499
	绿色生产认知 Green Production Cognition (X₁₂)	是否参加过绿色生产方面的培训: 否=0, 是=1 Have you participated in green production training? no=0, yes=1	0.572	0.456	0.501
	绿色生产意愿 Green Production Intention (X₁₃)	绿色生产技术的采纳意愿: 非常不愿意=1, 不愿意=2, 一般=3,愿意=4, 非常愿意=5 Willingness to adopt green production technology: very reluctant=1, not willing=2, generally=3, willing=4, very willing=5	4.387	4.407	0.699
	绿色产品认可度 Green Product recognition (X₁₄)	您认为目前绿色农产品销售难易程度如何: 非常难=1, 比较难=2, 一般=3, 比较容易=4, 非常容易=5 How difficult do you think it is to sell green agricultural products at present: very difficult=1, Relatively difficult=2, generally=3, relatively easy=4, very easy=5	3.202	3.250	0.952

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 加入合作社对家庭农场绿色生产的影响定量分析表

Table 4. Quantitative analysis of the influence of joining cooperatives on green production of family farms

绿色生产行为类别 Green production behavior category	总体(421家) Overall (421)	加入合作社(125家) Join cooperatives (125)			未加入合作社(296家) Not joining cooperatives (296)
绿色生产行为类别 Green production behavior category	总体(421家) Overall (421)	总体 Overall	领办人(82家) Leader (82)	普通社员(43家) Ordinary Members (43)	未加入合作社(296家) Not joining cooperatives (296)
深松耕作 Deep loosening cultivation	277(65.80%)	81(64.80%)	57(69.51%)	24(55.81%)	196(66.26%)
秸秆还田 Straw returned	276(65.56%)	77(61.60%)	54(65.85%)	23(53.49%)	199(67.23%)
测土配方施肥 Soil testing formula fertilization	230(54.63%)	80(64.00%)	51(62.20%)	29(67.44%)	150(50.68%)
节水灌溉(喷灌、滴灌等) Water-saving irrigation (sprinkler irrigation, drip irrigation, etc.)	287(68.17%)	101(80.80%)	66(80.49%)	35(81.40%)	186(62.84%)
病虫害绿色防控 Green prevention and control of diseases and insect pests	256(60.81%)	85(68.00%)	57(69.51%)	28(65.12%)	171(57.77%)
施用有机肥 Application of organic fertilizer	313(74.35%)	104(83.20%)	67(81.71%)	37(86.05%)	209(70.61%)
水肥一体化 Water and fertilizer integration	199(47.27%)	72(57.60%)	46(56.10%)	26(60.47%)	127(42.91%)
回收农药废弃物 Recycling pesticide waste	176(41.81%)	61(48.80%)	43(52.44%)	18(41.86%)	115(38.85%)
畜禽养殖废弃物生态处理 Ecological treatment of livestock and poultry breeding waste	113(26.84%)	34(27.20%)	26(31.71%)	8(18.60%)	79(26.69%)
1)表中参与合作社的家庭农场+未参与合作社的家庭农场=全样本; 作为合作社普通社员的家庭农场+作为合作社领办人的家庭农场=参与合作社的家庭农场。2)表中括号内数据为采纳绿色生产的家庭农场数量与所在列家庭农场数量的比值。1) Family farms participating in cooperatives+family farms not participating in cooperatives in the table = full sample; Family farms as ordinary members of cooperatives+family farms as cooperative leaders = family farms participating in cooperatives. 2) The data in brackets in the table are the ratio of the number of family farms adopting green production to the number of family farms in the column.

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 加入合作社对家庭农场绿色生产影响的排序回归结果

Table 5. Sorting regression results of the influence of joining cooperatives on green production of family farms

模型 Model	Logit模型 Logit model			Probit模型 Probit model
模型 Model	模型1 Model 1	模型2 Model 2	模型3 Model 3	模型4 Model 4	模型5 Model 5
是否加入合作社 Whether to join a cooperative (X₁)	0.554^***(0.186)	0.352^*(0.189)	0.368^**(0.188)	0.229^**(0.108)	0.242^**(0.111)
性别 Gender (X₂)		0.233(0.218)		0.223(0.218)	0.086(0.125)
年龄 Age (X₃)		0.002(0.010)		0.002(0.010)	0.000(0.006)
受教育程度 Education Level (X₄)		−0.057(0.106)		-0.059(0.106)	−0.036(0.060)
经营类型 Type of Business (X₅)		−0.235^***(0.071)	−0.252^***(0.067)	−0.234^***(0.071)	−0.130^***(0.041)
农场经营年限 Years of farm operation (X₆)		−0.102(0.070)		−0.100(0.070)	−0.048(0.038)
农场土地面积 Farm land area (X₇)		0.364(0.235)		0.351(0. 236)	0.277^**(0.128)
农场劳动力数量 Number of farm labor (X₈)		0.015^**(0.008)	0.019^**(0.008)	0.015^***(0.008)	0.009^**(0.005)
产品销售质检 Product Sales Quality Inspection (X₉)		0.313(0.228)		0.318(0.229)	0.192(0.134)
产品原产地追溯 Product origin tracing (X₁₀)		0.335^*(0.198)	0.382^**(0.194)	0.337^*(0.198)	0.168(0.115)
产品质量认证 Product Quality Certification (X₁₁)		0.330^*(0.190)	0.338^**(0.185)	0.334^*(0.190)	0.167(0.111)
绿色生产认知 Green Production Cognition (X₁₂)		0.752^***(0.185)	0.756^***(0.183)	0.746^***(0.185)	0.441^***(0.108)
绿色生产意愿 Green Production Intention (X₁₃)		0.582^***(0.132)	0.539^***(0.129)	0.587^***(0.132)	0.306^***(0.075)
绿色产品认可度 Green Product recognition (X₁₄)		−0.078(0.095)		−0.076(0.095)	−0.046(0.054)
准R²	0.0052	0.0524	0.0481	0.0529	0.0522
、和*分别表示在10%、5%和1%统计水平上显著。括号内数字为标准差。, and * respectively represent significant at the statistical level of 10%, 5% and 1%. Date in brackets are standard deviation.

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 加入合作社对家庭农场不同绿色生产行为的回归分析

Table 6. Regression analysis of joining cooperatives on different green production behaviors of family farms

	深松耕作 Deep loosening cultivation	秸秆还田 Straw returned	测土配方施肥 Soil testing formula fertilization	节水灌溉 Water saving irrigation	病虫害绿色防控 Green prevention and control of diseases and insect pests	施用有机肥 Application of organic fertilizer	水肥一体化 Water and fertilizer integration	回收农药废弃物 Recycling pesticide waste	畜禽养殖废弃物生态处理 Ecological treatment of livestock and poultry breeding waste
加入合作社 Join a cooperative	−0.063 (0.224)	−0.246 (0.222)	0.548^** (0.220)	0.912^*** (0.257)	0.440^** (0.225)	0.723^*** (0.271)	0.592^*** (0.216)	0.406^* (0.215)	0.026 (0.240)
其他变量 Other variables	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control
常数项 Constant term	0.672^*** (0.123)	0.719^*** (0.124)	0.027 (0.116)	0.525^*** (0.120)	0.313^*** (0.118)	0.876^*** (0.128)	−0.286^** (0.117)	−0.454^*** (0.119)	−1.010 (0.131)
准R² Quasi R²	0.0001	0.0023	0.0110	0.0263	0.0070	0.0161	0.0131	0.0062	0.0000

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 不同特征的家庭农场加入合作社对绿色生产行为的回归分析

Table 7. Regression analysis on green production behavior of family farms with different characteristics joining cooperatives

不同作物 Different crops	粮食 Grain	蔬菜 Vegetables	水果 Fruit	畜禽养殖 Livestock and poultry breeding	其他 Other
加入合作社 Join a cooperative	0.902^**(0.355)	0.756^**(0.391)	~0.105(0.349)	0.370(0.600)	0.309(0.654)
其他解释变量 Other Explanatory variables	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control
准R² Quasi R²	0.0143	0.0104	0.0002	0.0015	0.0010
不同劳动力数量 Different numbers of labor force	5人以下	6~10人	10~20人	20人以上
参与合作社 Participate in a cooperative	0.229(0.320)	0.440(0.313)	1.337^***(0.432)	0.323(0.556)
其他解释变量 Other Explanatory variables	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control	控制 Control
准R² Quasi R²	0.0009	0.0031	0.0263	0.0020

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(33)

[1]	张林秀, 白云丽, 孙明星, 等. 从系统科学视角探讨农业生产绿色转型[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(10): 42−50 ZHANG L X, BAI Y L, SUN M X, et al. Views on agricultural green production from the perspective of system science[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(10): 42−50
[2]	庄天慧, 刘成, 张海霞. 农业补贴抑制了农药施用行为吗?[J]. 农村经济, 2021(7): 120−128 ZHUANG T H, LIU C, ZHANG H X. Do agricultural subsidies inhibit behaviors of pesticide application?[J]. Rural Economy, 2021(7): 120−128
[3]	张红丽, 李洁艳, 史丹丹. 环境规制、生态认知对农户有机肥采纳行为影响研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(11): 42−50 ZHANG H L, LI J Y, SHI D D. Research on the influence of environmental regulation and ecological cognition on farmers’ organic fertilizer adoption behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(11): 42−50
[4]	王若男, 韩旭东, 崔梦怡, 等. 农户绿色生产技术采纳的增收效应: 基于质量经济学视角[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(3): 462−473 WANG R N, HAN X D, CUI M Y, et al. The income-increasing effect of adopting green technologies by farmers: from the perspective of quality economics[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2021, 42(3): 462−473
[5]	王志刚, 于滨铜. 农业产业化联合体概念内涵、组织边界与增效机制: 安徽案例举证[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(2): 60−80 WANG Z G, YU B T. The conceptual connotation, organizational boundary and synergistic mechanism of agricultural industrialization union: evidence from Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(2): 60−80
[6]	张笑寒, 汤晓倩. 农业产业化联合体参与主体的绿色生产行为研究−基于政府激励视角[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2021, 20(2): 187−198 doi: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2021.02.20 ZHANG X H, TANG X Q. Green production behavior of participants in agricultural industrialization consortium: from the perspective of government incentive[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2021, 20(2): 187−198 doi: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2021.02.20
[7]	来晓东, 杜志雄, 郜亮亮. 加入合作社对粮食类家庭农场收入影响的实证分析−基于全国644家粮食类家庭农场面板数据[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(1): 143−154 LAI X D, DU Z X, GAO L L. An empirical analysis of the impact of joining cooperatives on farm income of grain family farms: based on panel data of 644 grain family farms in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 21(1): 143−154
[8]	陈文标. 家庭农场兴起背景下的农民专业合作社转型升级[J]. 农村经济, 2014(2): 113−116 CHEN W B. Transformation and upgrading of farmers' professional cooperatives under the background of the rise of family farms[J]. Rural Economy, 2014(2): 113−116
[9]	王勇. 家庭农场和农民专业合作社的合作关系问题研究[J]. 中国农村观察, 2014(2): 39−48,93 WANG Y. Research on Co-operational relationships of family farms and farmer specialized cooperatives[J]. China Rural Survey, 2014(2): 39−48,93
[10]	田云, 张俊飚, 何可, 等. 农户农业低碳生产行为及其影响因素分析−以化肥施用和农药使用为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2015(4): 61−70 TIAN Y, ZHANG J B, HE K, et al. Analysis of farmers' low-carbon production behavior and its influencing factors — Taking the application of chemical fertilizer and pesticide as examples[J]. China Rural Survey, 2015(4): 61−70
[11]	夏雯雯, 杜志雄, 郜亮亮. 家庭农场经营者应用绿色生产技术的影响因素研究−基于三省452个家庭农场的调研数据[J]. 经济纵横, 2019(6): 101−108 XIA W W, DU Z X, GAO L L. Research on the factors affecting the application of green production technology by family farm operators — Based on survey data of 452 family farms in three provinces[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2019(6): 101−108
[12]	蔡荣, 汪紫钰, 钱龙, 等. 加入合作社促进了家庭农场选择环境友好型生产方式吗? −以化肥、农药减量施用为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2019(1): 51−65 CAI R, WANG Z Y, QIAN L, et al. Do cooperatives promote family farms to choose environmental-friendly production practices? An empirical analysis of fertilizers and pesticides reduction[J]. China Rural Survey, 2019(1): 51−65
[13]	焦翔, 王思博, 乔玉辉. 生态农场绿色发展影响因素研究−基于119个生态农场的调研数据[J]. 经济纵横, 2021(10): 104−113 JIAO X, WANG S B, QIAO Y H. A study on influencing factors of green development of ecological farm — Based on the survey data of 119 ecological farms[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2021(10): 104−113
[14]	王春来. 发展家庭农场的三个关键问题探讨[J]. 农业经济问题, 2014, 35(1): 43−48 doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2014.01.006 WANG C L. Discussion on three key issues of developing family farms[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2014, 35(1): 43−48 doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2014.01.006
[15]	段海霞, 易朝辉, 苏晓华. 创业拼凑、商业模式创新与家庭农场创业绩效关系−基于湖南省的典型案例分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2021(6): 26−46 DUAN H X, YI Z H, SU X H. The relationship between entrepreneurial bricolage, business model innovation and entrepreneurial performance of family farms: an analysis based on typical cases in Hunan Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2021(6): 26−46
[16]	沈琼, 李家家. 地权稳定促进了家庭农场的农地保护性投资吗−基于620户家庭农场的实证分析[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(6): 111−123,128 SHEN Q, LI J J. Does tenure security promote the protective investment in farmland of family farms — Empirical analysis based on 620 family farms[J]. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2020(6): 111−123,128
[17]	刘帅, 沈兴兴, 朱守银. 农业产业化经营组织制度演进下的农户绿色生产行为研究[J]. 农村经济, 2020(11): 37−44 LIU S, SHEN X X, ZHU S Y. Research on farmers’ green production behavior under the evolution of agricultural industrialization organization system[J]. Rural Economy, 2020(11): 37−44
[18]	郭晓鸣, 廖祖君. 公司领办型合作社的形成机理与制度特征−以四川省邛崃市金利猪业合作社为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2010(5): 48−55,84 GUO X M, LIAO Z J. Formation mechanism and institutional characteristics of company-led cooperatives—taking jinli pig industry cooperative in Qionglai, Sichuan Province as an example[J]. China Rural Survey, 2010(5): 48−55,84
[19]	李晓静, 陈哲, 夏显力. 参与电商对猕猴桃种植户绿色生产转型的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(4): 150−160 LI X J, CHEN Z, XIA X L. The impact of participating in E-commerce on the transformation of kiwifruit growers’ green production[J]. Journal of Northwest A& F University (Social Science Edition), 2021, 21(4): 150−160
[20]	王定祥, 谭进鹏. 论现代农业特征与新型农业经营体系构建[J]. 农村经济, 2015(9): 23−28 WANG D X, TAN J P. On the characteristics of modern agriculture and the construction of new agricultural management system[J]. Rural Economy, 2015(9): 23−28
[21]	张社梅, 陈锐, 罗娅. 公证嵌入下农业高质量发展的路径探讨−基于新型农业生产经营主体微观视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(6): 66−74 ZHANG S M, CHEN R, LUO Y. A study on the path of high-quality development of agriculture embedded in notarizationbased on the micro perspective of the new agricultural producers[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, 41(6): 66−74
[22]	赵晓颖, 郑军, 张明月. 流转地经营权稳定性对家庭农场耕地保护行为的影响−以增施有机肥及测土配方施肥为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(8): 31−42 ZHAO X Y, ZHENG J, ZHANG M Y. The influence of transferred land tenure security on family farms’cultivated land protection behaviors — Taking the application of organic fertilizer and formula fertilization as examples[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(8): 31−42
[23]	曹裕, 陶兰, 吴堪. 信息不对称下订单农业合约设计[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2021, 42(4): 97−103 CAO Y, TAO L, WU K. Contract design for contract farming under information asymmetry[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2021, 42(4): 97−103
[24]	李昊, 李世平, 南灵. 农药施用技术培训减少农药过量施用了吗?[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(10): 80−96 LI H, LI S P, NAN L. Can technical training reduce pesticide overuse?[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017(10): 80−96
[25]	HUETH B, LIGON E. Producer price risk and quality measurement[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 81(3): 512−524 doi: 10.2307/1244011
[26]	刘威, 马恒运. 包容性视域下农业产业化联合体共生关系的实证分析[J]. 农村经济, 2020(11): 95−103 LIU W, MA H Y. An empirical analysis of the symbiosis of agricultural industrialization consortium from the perspective of inclusiveness[J]. Rural Economy, 2020(11): 95−103
[27]	钟真, 蒋维扬, 赵泽瑾. 农业产业化联合体的主要形式与运行机制−基于三个典型案例的研究[J]. 学习与探索, 2021(2): 91−101,176,2 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-462X.2021.02.014 ZHONG Z, JIANG W Y, ZHAO Z J. Main forms and operating mechanisms of agro-industrial alliance — Based on research on three typical cases[J]. Study & Exploration, 2021(2): 91−101,176,2 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-462X.2021.02.014
[28]	程玲娟, 邹伟. 契约稳定性能否提升家庭农场耕地质量保护行为? −基于空间计量分析[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 48(2): 107−119 CHENG L J, ZOU W. Can contract stability improve farmland quality protection behaviors on family farms? — Based on spatial econometric analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 48(2): 107−119
[29]	赵昶, 孔祥智, 仇焕广. 农业经营规模扩大有助于化肥减量吗−基于全国1274个家庭农场的计量分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(4): 110−121 ZHAO C, KONG X Z, QIU H G. Does the expansion of farm size contribute to the reduction of chemical fertilizers? — Empirical analysis based on 1274 family farms in China[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(4): 110−121
[30]	郭田雨, 周宏. 家庭农场对绿色生产的影响−以江苏省三市水稻种植户为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(8): 216−222 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2022.8.028 GUO T Y, ZHOU H. Impact of family farms on green production: taking rice growers in three cities of Jiangsu Province as an example[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(8): 216−222 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2022.8.028
[31]	杨晨遥, 庄天慧. 认知视角下家庭农场亲环境生产行为意愿形成机制研究−来自四川的微观经验证据[J]. 经济体制改革, 2022(4): 80−87 YANG C Y, ZHUANG T H. Study on the mechanism of willingness formation of pro-environmental production behavior in family farms from a cognitive perspective — Micro-level empirical evidence from Sichuan[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2022(4): 80−87
[32]	CHENG J C H, MONROE M C. Connection to nature[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2012, 44(1): 31−49 doi: 10.1177/0013916510385082
[33]	闫阿倩, 罗小锋, 黄炎忠. 社会化服务对农户农药减量行为的影响研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(10): 91−97 doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.274 YAN A Q, LUO X F, HUANG Y Z. Influence of socialized services on farmers’ pesticide reduction behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(10): 91−97 doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.274