Volume 31 Issue 12
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG P, LI G C, LIU D. Impact of informatization of agricultural extension services on farmers’ scientific fertilization technology adoption decisions[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(12): 2033−2043 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230301
Citation: WANG P, LI G C, LIU D. Impact of informatization of agricultural extension services on farmers’ scientific fertilization technology adoption decisions[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(12): 2033−2043 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230301

Impact of informatization of agricultural extension services on farmers’ scientific fertilization technology adoption decisions

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230301
Funds:  This study was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (18ZDA072).
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: lgcabc@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2023-05-30
  • Accepted Date: 2023-08-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-08-30
  • Available Online: 2023-09-11
  • Publish Date: 2023-12-15
  • Continuously promoting scientific fertilization is a powerful support for achieving a stable food supply and constructing an ecological civilization. To explore the effective strategies to promote scientific fertilization by Chinese farmers in the context of digital village construction, this study uses the Heckman two-stage model based on the data from 1256 surveys of farmers in the rice producing areas of Hubei Province to explore the influence of informatization of agricultural extension services on the adoption decision of scientific fertilization technology by farmers in terms of “adoption behavior” and “the degree of adoption”. Additionally, we analyzed the mechanism of informatization of agricultural extension services on scientific fertilization technology adoption decision by farmers using the stepwise regression method. The results are presented as follows: 1) The informatization of agricultural extension services had a significant positive effect on adoption behavior of farmers and the degree of adoption of scientific fertilization technologies. 2) There are differences in the effects of informatization of agricultural extension services on different types of scientific fertilization technologies. The informatization of agricultural extension services had a more significant effect on the adoption of efficient fertilization technologies by farmers than the application of new fertilizers. 3) The informatization of agricultural extension services promoted adoption behavior of farmers by improving benefit perception; it also promoted the adoption behavior of farmers and the degree of their adoption by reducing risk perception. Consequently, this study proposes policy recommendations to continuously enrich the forms and service contents of information-based agricultural extension services, improve the cooperative extension mechanism, and enhance the effectiveness of agricultural extension services through personalization and precision.
  • loading
  • [1]
    LIN Y, HU R F, ZHANG C, et al. The role of public agricultural extension services in driving fertilizer use in rice production in China[J]. Ecological Economics, 2022, 200: 107513 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107513
    [2]
    张露, 唐晨晨, 罗必良. 土地流转契约与农户化肥施用−基于契约盈利性、规范性和稳定性三个维度的考察[J]. 农村经济, 2021(9): 1−8

    ZHANG L, TANG C C, LUO B L. The contract of land transfer and farmers’ application of chemical fertilizer — Based on three dimensions of contract profitability, standardization and stability[J]. Rural Economy, 2021(9): 1−8
    [3]
    周曙东, 李幸子. 农户特征、外部环境与科学施肥[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(1): 50−58

    ZHOU S D, LI X Z. Farmers’ characteristics, external environment & scientific fertilization[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2021, 20(1): 50−58
    [4]
    李秋生, 郑凯欣, 刘小春. 新时代基层农技推广体系改革创新实践探索、制约因素及深化路径[J]. 世界农业, 2022(2): 80−89

    LI Q S, ZHENG K X, LIU X C. Practical exploration, constraints and deepening paths of the reform and innovation of grass-roots agricultural technology extension system in the new era[J]. World Agriculture, 2022(2): 80−89
    [5]
    李亚娟, 马骥. 科学施肥技术的收入效应差异分析−基于粮农初始禀赋的实证估计[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(7): 18−32

    LI Y J, MA J. Analysis of income effect differences of scientific fertilization technology — An empirical estimation based on farmers’ initial endowment[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(7): 18−32
    [6]
    桑贤策, 罗小锋. 新媒体使用对农户生物农药采纳行为的影响研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(6): 90−100, 190

    SANG X C, LUO X F. The impact of new media application on farmers’ adoption of biopesticide[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021(6): 90−100, 190
    [7]
    高天志, 冯辉, 陆迁. 数字农技推广服务促进了农户绿色生产技术选择吗?——基于黄河流域3省微观调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2023(9): 23–28

    GAO T Z, FENG H, LU Q. Can digital agricultural extension services promote farmers’ green production technology choices: based on micro-survey data from three provinces in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2023(9): 23–28
    [8]
    KHAN N A, GAO Q J, ALI S, et al. Analyzing ICT-enabled agricultural advisory services in Pakistan: evidence from a marginalized region of Punjab Province[J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2022, 22(4): 1107−1129 doi: 10.1007/s10660-020-09442-z
    [9]
    AKER J C. Dial “A” for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2011, 42(6): 631−647 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x
    [10]
    DILLON B. Using mobile phones to collect panel data in developing countries[J]. Journal of International Development, 2012, 24(4): 518−527 doi: 10.1002/jid.1771
    [11]
    毛慧, 刘树文, 彭澎, 等. 数字推广与农户化肥减量−来自陕西省苹果主产区的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2023(2): 66−84

    MAO H, LIU S W, PENG P, et al. Digital extension and farmers’ fertilizer reduction: an empirical analysis of China’s major apple producing areas in Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023(2): 66−84
    [12]
    王建鑫, 罗小锋, 唐林, 等. 线上与线下: 农技推广方式对农户生物农药施用行为的影响[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(2): 43−53

    WANG J X, LUO X F, TANG L, et al. Online and offline: the impact of agricultural technology extension methods on farmers’ application behavior of biological pesticides[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(2): 43−53
    [13]
    刘迪, 罗小锋. 短视频APP对农户绿色防控技术采纳的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(9): 1879−1890

    LIU D, LUO X F. The impact of short-video APPs on farmers’ adoption of green techniques of pest and disease control[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(9): 1879−1890
    [14]
    DING J P, JIA X P, ZHANG W F, et al. The effects of combined digital and human advisory services on reducing nitrogen fertilizer use: lessons from China’s national research programs on low carbon agriculture[J]. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2022, 20(6): 1136−1149 doi: 10.1080/14735903.2022.2057643
    [15]
    OYINBO O, CHAMBERLIN J, ABDOULAYE T, et al. Digital extension, price risk, and farm performance: experimental evidence from Nigeria[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2022, 104(2): 831−852 doi: 10.1111/ajae.12242
    [16]
    孙明扬. 基层农技服务供给模式的变迁与小农的技术获取困境[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(3): 40−52

    SUN M Y. Changes in the supply mode of basic agricultural technology services and the dilemma of farmers’ technology acquisition[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(3): 40−52
    [17]
    SCHULTZ T W. Transforming Traditional Agriculture[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964
    [18]
    史恒通, 王铮钰, 阎亮. 生态认知对农户退耕还林行为的影响−基于计划行为理论与多群组结构方程模型[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(3): 42−49

    SHI H T, WANG Z Y, YAN L. The influence of ecological cognition on farmers’ grain for green behavior: based on TPB and multi-group SEM[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(3): 42−49
    [19]
    高杨, 牛子恒. 风险厌恶、信息获取能力与农户绿色防控技术采纳行为分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(8): 109−127

    GAO Y, NIU Z H. Risk aversion, information acquisition ability and farmers’ adoption behavior of green control techniques[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(8): 109−127
    [20]
    魏彬彬, 杨志海. 政府推广、关系网络与农户生态耕种技术采纳行为[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(12): 2036−2049

    WEI B B, YANG Z H. Government promotion, social networks and farmers’ adoption behavior of ecological farming technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(12): 2036−2049
    [21]
    周力, 冯建铭, 应瑞瑶, 等. 农户精准施肥两阶段异质性及采纳行为研究−基于劳动偏向型特征的再考察[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(8): 81−91

    ZHOU L, FENG J M, YING R Y, et al. Two stages of precision fertilization and farmers’ adoption — Re-examination of labor-intensive characteristics[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(8): 81−91
    [22]
    王泮蘅, 王立民. 环境规制情境下农户认知对玉米秸秆还田技术采纳行为的影响研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(10): 60−66

    WANG P H, WANG L M. Effect of farmer’s cognition on the adoption of returning maize stalk to field under environmental regulation[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(10): 60−66
    [23]
    万凌霄, 蔡海龙. 合作社参与对农户测土配方施肥技术采纳影响研究−基于标准化生产视角[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(3): 63−77

    WAN L X, CAI H L. Study on the impact of cooperative’s participation on farmers’ adoption of testing soil for formulated fertilization technology — Analysis based on the perspective of standardized production[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(3): 63−77
    [24]
    田路, 郑少锋, 陈如静. 绿色防控技术采纳影响因素及收入效应研究−基于792户菜农调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(10): 1687−1697 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220038

    TIAN L, ZHENG S F, CHEN R J. The influencing factors and income effects of green prevention-control technology adoption — An empirical analysis based on the survey data of 792 vegetable growers[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(10): 1687−1697 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220038
    [25]
    黄炎忠, 罗小锋. 既吃又卖: 稻农的生物农药施用行为差异分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(7): 63−78

    HUANG Y Z, LUO X F. “both to eat and sell”: an analysis of biological pesticides application behaviors of different rice farmers[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(7): 63−78
    [26]
    张振旺, 张君慧, 宋宇. 技术环境对蔬菜种植户有机肥技术采纳行为的影响——以河南省设施菜农为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(7): 117–128

    ZHANG Z W, ZHANG J H, SONG Y. Effects of technological environment on the adoption behavior of organic fertilizer technology for vegetable farmers — A case study of the facility vegetable farmers in Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(7): 117–128
    [27]
    IACOBUCCI D. Mediation analysis and categorical variables: the final frontier[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2012, 22(4): 582−594 doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.006
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (158) PDF downloads(40) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return